A
H
A
N
D
B
O
O
K
KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook
WRITERS
Maricel Vigo
Atty. Marlon Manuel, SALIGAN
TECHNICAL AND EDITORIALTEAM
Atty. Marlon Manuel, SALIGAN
Divina Lopez, LGSP
Myn Garcia, LGSP
Vic Alfaro, LGSP
Edgar Catalan, LGSP
Raissa Jajurie, SALIGAN Mindanao
Raymond Salas, SALIGAN Mindanao
Pedrito Acosta, Region 12
Liza del Norte, IPHC
Allan Carpio, RCED
ILLUSTRATIONSAND COVERDESIGN
Arnold Beroya
ART DIRECTIONAND LAYOUT
A
H
A
N
D
B
O
O
K
KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook
Copyright © 2004 Philippines-Canada Local Government
Support Program (LGSP)
All rights reserved
The Philippines- Canada Local Government Support
Program (LGSP) encourages the use, translation, and
adaptation and copying of this material for non-commercial
use, with appropriate credit given to LGSP.
Although reasonable care has been taken in the
preparation of this handbook, neither the publisher and/or
contributor and/or writer can accept any liability for any
consequence arising from the use thereof or from any
information contained herein.
ISBN 971-92952-0-1
Printed and bound in Manila, Philippines
Published by:
Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal (SALIGAN)
1/F Hoffner Bldg., Social Development Complex
Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, 1108
Quezon City, Philippines
✆ (632) 4266001 local 4858 or 4860
Philippines-Canada Local Government Support
Program (LGSP)
Unit 1507 Jollibee Plaza
Emerald Avenue, 1600 Pasig City, Philippines
✆ (632) 637 3511-13
www.lgsp.org.ph
This project was undertaken with the financial support of
the Government of Canada provided through the Canadian
International Development Agency (CIDA).
IMPLEMENTED BY
A JOINT PROJECT OF
Agriteam Canada
www.agriteam.ca Federation of CanadianMunicipalities (FCM)
www.fcm.caDepartment of the Interior
and Local Government (DILG)
National Economic andDevelopment Authority (NEDA)
Canadian InternationalDevelopment AgencyProgramme de soutien aux
gouvernments locauxPHILIPPINES-CANADALOCAL GOVERNMENTSUPPORT PROGRAM
Foreword
Acknowledgements
Preface
Definition of Terms
Introduction
PART
1
:
ACTUAL PROCESSES
Chapter 1 — Constitution of the Lupon
Chapter 2 — Mediation through
the Punong Barangay
Chapter 3 — Conciliation through
the Pangkat Tagapagkasundo
Chapter 4 — Arbitration
Chapter 5 — Indigenous Modes of Dispute
Resolution
PART
2
:
BENEFITS
,
INCENTIVES AND AWARDS
Chapter 1 — Scholarships
Chapter 2 — Incentives and Awards
Annexes — Katarungang Pambarangay Forms
KP Form # 1
KP Form # 2
KP Form # 3
KP Form # 4
KP Form # 5
KP Form # 6
KP Form # 7
KP Form # 8
KP Form # 9
KP Form # 10
KP Form # 11
KP Form # 12
KP Form #13
KP Form #14
CONTENTS
vii
ix
xi
xiii
1
9
20
33
52
58
69
73
Notice to Constitute the Lupon
Appointment Letter
Notice of Appointment
List of Appointed Lupon Members
Lupon Member Oath Statement
Withdrawal of Appointment
Complainant’s Form
Notice of Hearing
Summon for the Respondent
Notice for Constitution of Pangkat
Notice to Chosen Pangkat Member
Notice of Hearing (Conciliation
Proceedings)
Subpoena Letter
KP Form # 15
KP Form # 16
KP Form # 17
KP Form # 18
KP Form # 19
KP Form # 20
KP Form # 21
KP Form # 22
KP Form # 23
KP Form # 24
KP Form # 25
KP Form # 26
KP Form # 27
KP Form # 28
Arbitration Award
Amicable Settlement
Repudiation
Notice of Hearing for Complainant
Notice of Hearing for Respondent
Certification to File Action (from
Lupon Secretary)
Certification to File Action (from
Pangkat Secretary)
Certification to File Action
Certification to Bar Action
Certification to Bar Counterclaim
Motion for Execution
Notice of Hearing (Re: Motion for
Execution
Notice of Execution
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G AY
IT has always been a source of pride for us in the
Department of the Interior and Local Government to
bear witness to outstanding initiatives of partners in
local governance. We are therefore pleased to
acknowledge the latest publication of the
Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP),
Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook.
Republic Act 7160, otherwise known as the 1991
Local Government Code, gives barangays the
mandate to enforce peace and order and provide
support for the effective enforcement of human
rights and justice. Decentralization has facilitated the
recognition of the Katarungang Pambarangay or
Barangay Justice System as an alternative venue for
the resolution of disputes. The challenge facing local
governments now is to maximize and harness the
katarungang pambarangay as one of the most
valuable mechanisms available in administering
justice, advancing human rights protection and
resolving and/or mediating conflict at the barangay
level through non-adversarial means.
Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook
provides local governments an easy-to-use tool with
which to take up this challenge. It fills the need to
increase the awareness and understanding of
katarungang pambarangay and its value as an
empowering and alternative tool for the resolution of
community and family disputes at the barangay
level. With the fast-evolving demand for access to
justice, there is a need to utilize this mechanism
more strategically and proactively as a way to
promote peace at the grassroots. The Punong
Barangay (Barangay Heads), members of the Lupong
Tagapamayapa (Peace Council) and communities will
FOREWORD
A H A N D B O O K
benefit greatly from this publication. Moreover,
development workers, the academe and
non-governmental and people’s organizations will also
find this handbook useful in their work on barangay
justice.
This undertaking complements the efforts of the
DILG to popularize and mainstream governance
knowledge products through the Local Government
Academy and the agency’s regional learning centers.
The handbook provides a means for improved
access to dispute resolutions and will go a long way
towards enhancing knowledge on and strengthening
barangay governance and justice. The DILG,
therefore, congratulates the Philippines-Canada Local
Government Support Program for its commitment
and meaningful contributions to promoting
excellence in barangay governance as an integral
element of good, responsive and accountable local
governance.
HON. JOSE D. LINA JR.
Secretary
Department of the Interior and Local Government
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
THE support, collaboration and creative contributions
of the following individuals and institutions are
invaluable and were essential to the completion of
this publication:
The Philippines-Canada Local Government Support
Program led by Alix Yule and Marion Maceda
Villanueva for providing the necessary direction and
support
The Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal
(SALIGAN), especially Atty. Marlon J. Manuel, for their
partnership
Maricel Vigo for the overall writeup and excellent
technical contribution
LGSP Area Managers Tess Gajo, Merlinda Hussein,
Evelyn ji*z and LGSP Program Officers namely Vic
Alfaro, Edgar Catalan, Abduljim Hassan and Cris
Tagupa for their invaluable collaboration
LGSP Local Resource Partners Raissa Jajurie and
Raymond Salas of SALIGAN Mindanao, Pedrito Acosta
(Reg 12), Liza del Norte of Institute of Primary Health
Care (IPHC), Allan Carpio of Resource Center for
Empowerment and Development (RCED) for their
technical contribution
Divina Luz Lopez for her overall project management
and technical expertise in ensuring the quality of this
publication
Myn Garcia for providing technical and creative
direction, and overall supervision of the design,
layout and production
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A H A N D B O O K
Arnold Beroya for the illustrations and Alecks Pabico
for layout and overall art direction
Raymond Oliveros, Janilo Rubiato and Tess
Tajanlangit for the translation of the handbook to
Tagalog, Cebuano and Ilonggo, respectively
Ria Adapon and Sef Carandang for overall
coordination and editorial work
Gigi Barazon and the rest of the LGSP administrative
staff for providing support.
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
KATARUNGANG Pambarangay: A Handbook is the
latest publication of the Philippines-Canada Local
Government Support Program (LGSP) as part of its
mandate to mainstream effective and responsive
barangay governance.
Republic Act 7160 or the Local Government Code
of 1991 expanded the scope and powers of the
Katarungang Pambarangay or the Barangay Justice
System designed not merely to decongest the courts
of cases but to address inequalities in access to
justice, particularly experienced by marginalized
communities. The barangays, being the basic
political unit in the country, is in the most strategic
position to facilitate resolution or mediation of
community and family disputes, alongside its
mandate to deliver basic services.
In empowering local government units in Western
Visayas and Mindanao, LGSP has designed initiatives
that strengthen barangay governance, including
enhancing and mainstreaming the use of and access
to the barangay justice system. The Katarungang
Pambarangay: A Handbook was designed to provide
a user-friendly, easy to read and simple tool to
promote the knowledge of the katarungang
pambarangay as an effective alternative mechanism
for dispute resolution.
This handbook aims to increase the
understanding of the Punong Barangays (barangay
heads) and members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa
(Barangay Peace Council) on the processes and
procedures of the barangay justice system to enable
them to maximize its use in their communities. It is
also intended to provide a practical overview for the
PREFACE
A H A N D B O O K
members of the communities — paralegals,
non-government and people’s organizations — regarding
the role and benefits of the katarungang
pambarangay in their lives.
By doing so, LGSP hopes that it would somehow
make a difference in people’s lives by contributing to
a better understanding and strategic administration
of the barangay justice system. Katarungang
Pambarangay: A Handbook is a modest contribution
to creating greater awareness of an alternative to
what can be an elitist and complex legal system,
often characterized by an arduous legal process. This
publication is a way to empower grassroots
communities to exact their basic rights and provide
them a viable way to do so.
The Philippines-Canada Local Government
Support Program
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
Adjudication is the power of courts or quasi-judicial
agencies to decide cases filed before them and
falling within their jurisdiction.
Amicable Settlement is an agreement reached
during mediation and conciliation proceedings.
Arbitration is a process wherein the third party
from outside the judicial system is chosen by parties
to hear and decide their dispute.
Arbitration Award is the decision reached by either
the lupon chairperson or pangkat, as the case may
be, upon prior agreement in writing by the parites to
a dispute for the adjudicators to resolve it.
Attachment is a provisional remedy in the form of
an order issued by a judge before whom the case is
pending by which the property is taken into legal
custody as security for satisfaction of a judgment
obtained by the prevailing party, either at the
commencement of the action or any time after the
filing of the case before the final judgment
Complainant — plaintiff
Complaint is a concise statement of ultimate facts
constituting the plaintiff’s cause and causes of
action.
Conciliation is a process wherein the Pangkat
forgoes the power to decide or recommend but assist
the parties to isolate issues and options to reach a
settlement by consensus that jointly satisfies their
needs
DEFINITION
OF
TERMS
A H A N D B O O K
Delivery of Personal Property (Replevin) is
provisional remedy by which a judge before whom
an action is pending for the recovery of personal
property issues an order for the delivery of such
property to the movant or the party filing the petition
upon filing of a bond to guarantee its return or to
answer for the damages.
Execution is the process of exacting satisfaction for
on or both of the parties through compulsory or
coercive means. It entails the enforcement of the
terms of the amicable settlement or arbitration award
in so far as this may enjoin or command any of the
parties to perform an act, give something or refrain
from doing some act
Habeas Corpus is a judicial proceeding for the
purpose of releasing a person who is illegally
deprived of liberty or restoring rightful custody to
the person who has been deprived of.
Incompetent means a person who is suffering the
penalty of civil interdiction; or who is a hospitalized
leper, prodigal, deaf and dumb who is unable to
communicate; one who is of unsound mind, even
though he has a lucid intervals and a person not
being unsound mind but by reason of age, disease,
weak mind, and other similar causes, cannot,
without outside aid, take care of himself and mange
his property, becoming thereby an easy prey for
deceit and exploitation.
Jurisdiction is an authority to hear and decide a
case and given by law and cannot be agreed by the
parties
Katarungang Barangay (KP) is a system of justice
administered at the barangay level for the purpose of
amicable settling disputes through mediation,
conciliation or abitration among the family or
barangay without resorting to the courts.
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
Lupong Tagapamayapa (Lupon) is a body
organized in every barangay composed of Punong
Barangay as the chairperson and not less than ten
(10) and more than twenty from which the members
of every Pangkat shall be chosen.
Mediation is a process wherein the Lupon
chairperson or Barangay Chairperson assists the
disputing parties to reach a settlement by consensus
that jointly satisfies their needs.
Minor is a person below eighteen (18) years of age.
Next of Kin is an individual who is a relative or a
responsible friend with whom the minor or
incompetent lives
Pangkat Tagapagkasundo (Pangkat) is a
conciliation panel constituted from the Lupon
membership for every dispute brought before the
Lupon consisting of three (3) members after the
Punong Barangay has failed in his mediation efforts.
Preliminary injunction is a provisional remedy in
the form of an order issued by a judge before whom
the case is pending at any stage before the final
judgment requiring a person to refrain from a
particular act.
Repudiation is an act of rejecting the validity or
refusing to accept the terms and conditions of
agreement on the ground of vitiation of consent by
fraud, violence or intimidation.
Respondent — defendant
Statute of Limitations is the law which bars or
does not allow the institution or filing of an action or
case against another after the expiration of the
period prescribe d for such action or offense
Support Pendente Lite is a provisional remedy in a
A H A N D B O O K
form of an order issued by a judge before whom the
case is pending granting allowance, dwelling,
clothing, education and medical attendance to the
person entitled thereof.
Venue is the place where the case is to be heard and
decided. This is not fixed by law except in criminal
cases, and can be agreed upon by the parties.
INTRODUCTION
THE Katarungang Pambarangay or Barangay Justice
System is a community-based dispute settlement
mechanism that is administered by the basic political
unit of the country, the barangay. As a
community-based mechanism for dispute resolution, it covers
disputes between members of the same community
(generally, same city/municipality) and involves the
Punong Barangay and other members of the
communities (the Lupon members) as intermediaries
(mediators, conciliators, and, sometimes,
arbitrators).
The establishment and operation of the Barangay
Justice System is mandated by Republic Act No. 7160
or the Local Government Code of 1991. Prior to this
law, however, the establishment of the Barangay
Justice System had been covered by Presidential
Decree 1508 in 1978 and Batas Pambansa Blg. 337
or the 1983 Local Government Code.
When PD 1508 first decreed the setting up of the
Barangay Justice System, the law had the following
objectives:
X
To promote the speedy administration of
justice
X
To minimize the indiscriminate filing of cases
in courts
X
To minimize the congestion of court dockets
and thereby enhance the quality of justice
dispensed by the courts
X
To perpetuate and recognize the time-honored
tradition of amicably settling disputes at the
community level
2
A H A N D B O O K
These same objectives are stated in the
Katarungang Pambarangay Rules that were
promulgated by the Department of Justice on June 1,
1992, pursuant to the mandate of the Local
Government Code. These rules serve as the
implementing rules for the provisions of the Local
Government Code on the establishment,
administration, and operation of the Barangay Justice
System.
Under the Barangay Justice System, the main
strategy for settling disputes is to provide a venue
for the disputing parties to search for a solution that
is mutually acceptable. Hence, the primary role of
the system is not to decide disputes and impose a
solution on the parties but to assist the parties in
discussing the possible amicable settlement of their
disputes. The Punong Barangay and the community
conciliators (Lupon members) do not act as judges or
adjudicators of disputes but as facilitators for the
disputing parties’ discussion of possible solutions.
For this reason, the personal appearance and
participation of the disputing parties is necessary,
while the non-appearance of the parties will have
corresponding sanctions. Also because of the need
for the disputing parties’ personal participation in the
conciliation proceedings, disputes involving
non-natural persons like
corporations are not
subject to the
conciliation
proceedings of the
Barangay Justice
System.
The Barangay
Justice System
provides an
alternative mode for
dispute resolution to
the costly and lengthy
process of settling
Simply put, the
Barangay Justice
System provides a
friendly, inexpensive,
and speedy forum for
the settlement of
disputes where the
parties can freely
explore options for
amicably resolving
their disputes without
resorting to the
3
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G AY
disputes in regular courts. Instead of going through
the very technical procedure of filing formal
pleadings and presenting evidence in courts, the
parties of a dispute are given the opportunity to try
to talk to each other and resolve their disputes
amicably. The technical processes and rules that are
usually applied in court proceedings are not applied.
Filing a case in court, or defending oneself against
such a case,
would necessarily
entail the services
of lawyers. In the
Barangay Justice
System, however,
the parties do not
need to secure the
services of
lawyers. In fact,
the law prohibits
the participation
of lawyers in the
conciliation proceedings. While cases that are tried
in courts generally take years to be resolved, cases
that go through the Barangay Justice System would
generally take only a few weeks.
Simply put, the Barangay Justice System provides
a friendly, inexpensive, and speedy forum for the
settlement of disputes where the parties can freely
explore options for amicably resolving their disputes
without resorting to the courts.
On the issue of access to justice, the Barangay
Justice System provides an accessible mechanism for
resolving the justice issues of the poor.
In some areas where the courts are inaccessible,
both because of location and because of the
prohibitive costs of litigation, the Barangay Justice
System, with all its limitations, can be the only venue
that the poor can avail of for the resolution of their
disputes.
In some areas where the
courts are inaccessible, both
because of location and
because of the prohibitive
costs of litigation, the
Barangay Justice System,
with all its limitations, can
be the only venue that the
poor can avail of for the
resolution of their disputes.
4
A H A N D B O O K
The Barangay Justice System is also envisioned to
complement the courts in administering justice. For
cases that are covered by the Barangay Justice
System, it is compulsory for the parties to go
through the Barangay Justice System proceedings
first before going to court. Failure to do so would
mean the dismissal of the parties’ claim or
counterclaim. It is only when the Barangay Justice
System has failed to resolve the dispute that the
parties will be allowed to bring their case to court.
The Supreme Court issued Administrative
Circular No. 14-93 on July 15, 1993 directing the
courts to ensure compliance with the requirement of
prior recourse to the Barangay Justice as a condition
for filing a complaint in court for cases that are
covered by the system.
With more disputing parties settling their
disputes at the community level, it is expected that
the filing of cases between members of the same
community will be minimized. This, in turn, will help
reduce the congestion of the courts’ dockets and,
hopefully, improve the efficiency and quality of the
courts’ dispensation of justice. The Barangay Justice
system is, thus, both an alternative and
complementary mode of resolution to the court
system.
The Barangay Justice System maximizes the use
of time-honored traditions and practices of
communities in settling disputes between
community members. Filipinos traditionally resort to
the help of older members of the family, community
elders, or tribe leaders in resolving disputes between
members of the same family or community. This is
the common practice that is recognized and
formalized by the Barangay Justice System. In lieu of
family members, community elders, or tribe leaders,
the Barangay Justice System uses the Punong
Barangay and the Lupon Members, who are
appointed from the respected members of the
5
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G AY
community. In recognition of traditional customary
practices in some indigenous communities, the law
on the Barangay Justice System provides that in
communities that have distinct traditional practices
of settling disputes, the customs and traditions of
the indigenous cultural communities shall be
applied. Thus, local systems of settling disputes
through their councils of datus or elders are
recognized and followed with the same force and
effect as the procedure laid down in the law.
The strength of the Barangay Justice System lies
in the fact that it is based in the community itself,
and is administered by community members using
traditional practices in dispute resolution. With this
set-up, the disputing parties are expected to be more
comfortable in discussing their problems and in
exploring solutions to the disputes. It is likewise
expected that the community-based set-up of the
Barangay Justice System will ensure that the parties
will honor the amicable settlement that was agreed
upon. Ultimately, the Barangay Justice System is
envisioned to live up to its name. It is expected to
ensure the dispensation of justice at the grassroots
level.
The first part of the handbook discusses the
actual processes of the Katarungang Pambarangay
(KP). The second part deals with the benefits,
incentives and awards of the system. The Annexes
contains samples of al the KP forms that are used in
the process, for reference.
The Supreme Court issued Administrative
Circular No. 14-93 on July 15, 1993 directing the
courts to ensure compliance with the
requirement of prior recourse to the Barangay
Justice as a condition for filing a complaint in
court for cases that are covered by the system.
6
A H A N D B O O K
This handbook has also been translated to three
Philippine dialects, namely Tagalog, Cebuano and
Ilonggo, to facilitate greater use and understanding
of the system at the community level. Also, a
handbook on the Barangay Justice System in ARMM is
being developed, which takes a look at the existing
indigenous/traditional mechanisms of dispensing
justice in the Muslim and Moro cultures.
P
A
R
T
O
N
E
ACTUAL
PRACTICES
THANK YOU
.
ACTUALLY
,
ICAMETO ASKSOMEQUESTIONSREGARDING THE ADMINISTRA
-TION OF THEBARANGAYJUSTICESYSTEM INOURBARANGAY
.
WELL
,
YOU HAVECOMETOTHE RIGHT
PERSON
,
SITDOWN AND
HAVE
SOME
COFFEE
.
YOU KNOWCELIA
,
BARANGAY JUSTICE OR
KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAYISONE
IMPORTANT SYSTEMIN OURBARANGAY TORESOLVE DISPUTESFAIRLYAND SPEEDILY
.
THISISA SALIENT PART OFTHEBARANGAY
’
SFUNCTION TOPROMOTEPEACE AND HARMONIOUS RELATIONSHIPSAMONG COMMUNITYMEMBERS
.
THIS ISALSOIN RECOGNITIONOFTHECAPACITYOFTHE BARANGAYAND ITS LEADERSTOFACILITATE THESETTLEMENT AND
RESOLUTION OFDISPUTESAT THEIRLEVEL
.
HELLO
.
GOOD MORNING
,
TOO
.
CONGRATULATIONSTOTHENEWPUNONGBARANGAYOFBAGONGDIWA
.
WHATCAN IDOFORYOU
?
GOODMORNING
,
KAPITAN PEDRING
.
CONSTITUTION
OF
THE
LUPON
C H A P T E R O N E
ONEMORNINGINBARANGAYPAG
-
ASA
...
10
A H A N D B O O K
HE
/
SHE CANBE CHARGEDOFNEGLECT OFDUTYAND BESUBJECTED TOADMINISTRATIVESANCTIONS
.
WHATIFTHEPUNONG
BARANGAYFAILS TOORGANIZE THELUPON
?
REALLY
?
WHENAND HOWCANI CONSTITUTETHELUPON
?
WITHINFIFTEEN
(
15
)
DAYSFROM THE STARTOFOUR TERM ASPUNONGBARANGAY
,
WESHOULDISSUE A NOTICETOCONSTITUTE THELUPONAND PREPARETHELISTOF THENAMES OFPROPOSEDLUPONMEMBERS
.
AMINIMUM OF TENAND AMAXIMUMOFTWENTY PERSONS
.
HOW MANY PEOPLE
SHOULD IINCLUDEIN THE LIST
?
I SEE
.
BUTISIT ONLYTHE PUNONGBARANGAY WHOHASTHE AUTHORITY TOCONSTITUTE THE LUPON
?
YES
,
THEPUNONG BARANGAYCANAPPOINT THELUPON MEMBERS
.
IT
IS HIS
/
HEREXCLUSIVE
PREROGATIVE
—
NO NEEDFORAPPROVAL
,
CONFIRMATION ORRATIFICATIONOFTHE
11
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
WHO AREQUALIFIED TOBEMEMBERS OFTHELUPON
?
ANYBODY WHOISAN ACTUAL RESIDENTORWORKING INTHE BARANGAY
,
OFLEGAL AGEAND POSSESSESTHE FOLLOWING
QUALITIES
:
INTEGRITY
,
IMPARTIALITY
,
INDEPENDENCE
,
FAIRNESS
,
REPUTATIONFORPROBITY
,
PATIENCE
,
RESOURCEFULNESS
,
OPEN
-
MINDEDNESS ANDFLEXIBILITY
,
CAN BEA MEMBEROF THELUPON
.
QUALIFIED AS LUPONMEMBERS ACTUALRESIDENTS
/
WORKINGIN THE
BARANGAY OFLEGAL AGE
WITH THEFOLLOWING
QUALITIES
:
INTEGRITY
,
IMPARTIALITY
,
INDEPENDENCE
,
FAIRNESS
,
REPUTATION FOR
PROBITY
,
PATIENCE
,
RESOURCEFULNESS
,
OPEN
-
MINDEDNESS FLEXIBILITYDISQUALIFIED TO BELUPON MEMBERS
BELOW
18
YRSOfa*gE INCOMPETENT CONVICTEDOFA CRIMECARRYING WITHITPENALTIES OF PERPETUALORTEMPORARYDISQUALIFICATIONFROMHOLDING PUBLIC OFFICE ELECTED GOVERNMENT
OFFICIAL
MEMBER OFARMEDFORCES WHOIS IN THEACTIVE SERVICE
12
A H A N D B O O K
THISNOTICE SHALLBE POSTEDIN THREECONSPICUOUS ORSTRATEGIC PLACES
WITHIN THEBARANGAY
.
THE NOTICESHALLCONTAIN ANINVITATION TOALL
BARANGAYMEMBERS TO ENDORSEOROPPOSE THEPROPOSED
APPOINTMENT OFANY PERSON
/
SINCLUDEDIN THE LIST
.
THERECOMMENDATION SHALLBE MADE WITHINTHE PERIODOF POSTINGFOR THREEWEEKS
.
YOUR SECRETARY
,
WHOISALSO THE CONCURRENTSECRETARY OFLUPON
,
SHALLPREPARE ANOTICETO CONSTITUTETHELUPON USINGKP FORM 1.
AFTERIDENTIFYING THE
10
-
20 MEMBERS OFMYLUPON
,
WHATARE THENEXTSTEPS
?
AFTER THAT
,
WHERE SHALLWEPUT THENOTICE
?
13
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY
______ , 20__
NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE THE LUPON
To All Barangay Members and All Other Persons Concerned:In compliance with Section 1(a), Chapter 7, Title One, Book III, LocalGovernment Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160), of the KatarungangPambarangay Law, notice is hereby given to constitute the LupongTagapamayapa of this Barangay. The persons I am considering forappointment are the following:
1. __________________ 13. _________________2. __________________ 14. _________________3. __________________ 15. _________________4. __________________ 16. _________________5. __________________ 17. _________________6. __________________ 18. _________________7. __________________ 19. _________________8. __________________ 20. _________________9. __________________ 21. _________________10. _________________ 22. _________________11. _________________ 23. _________________12. _________________ 24. _________________25. _________________
They have been chosen on the basis of their suitability for the task ofconciliation considering their integrity, impartiality, independence of mind,sense of fairness and reputation for probity in view of their age, socialstanding in the community, tact, patience, resourcefulness, flexibility, openmindedness and other relevant factors. The law provides that only thoseactually residing or working in the barangay who are not expresslydisqualified by law are qualified to be appointed as Lupon members.All persons are hereby enjoined to immediately inform me and of theiropposition to or endorsem*nt of any or all the proposed members orrecommend to me other persons not included in the list but not later than the________ day of _______, 20__ (the last day for posting this notice).
_________________Punong Barangay
IMPORTANT: This notice is required to be posted in three (3) conspicuousplaces in the barangay for at least three (3) weeks
WARNING: Tearing or defacing this notice shall be subject to punishmentaccording to law.
14
A H A N D B O O K
YES
,
KAPITANA
.
ANDTEN DAYS AFTER THELAST DAY OFPOSTING
,
YOU
SHALLPUT INWRITINGYOURAPPOINTMENT OFYOUR LUPON MEMBERS
USINGKP FORM 2
,
DULY SIGNED BY THEPUNONGBARANGAY AND ATTESTED BY THEBARANGAY SECRETARY
.
Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY
______ , 20__ (Date)
APPOINTMENT
TO: ___________
Pursuant to Chapter 7, Title One, Book III, Local Government Code of 1991(Republic Act No. 7160), you are hereby appointed MEMBER of theLupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay effective upon taking your oath ofoffice and until a new Lupon is constituted on the third year following yourappointment. _________________Punong BarangayATTESTED:________________Barangay Secretary
KP FORM # 2: APPOINTMENT LETTER
YOU MEAN
,
ANY MEMBEROFMYBARANGAY CANPROTEST ORRECOMMEND SOMEBODYFROM THEBARANGAY
?
THE NEWLYAPPOINTED LUPONMEMBERS SHALL TAKE THEIROATHIMMEDIATELYBEFORE YOU ASPUNONGBARANGAY USINGKP
STEP 1: Determining the actual number
of Lupon Members
STEP 2: Preparing a notice to constitute the Lupon
STEP 3: Posting the notice to constitute the Lupon
STEP 4: Appointment of Lupon Members
STEP 5: Oath taking of Lupon members
STEP 6: Posting
SIX STEPS TO CONSTITUTETHE LUPON
AFTER THEIROATH TOOFFICE
,
WHATWILLIDO NEXT
?
THELIST OFAPPOINTEDLUPON MEMBERS SHALLBEPOSTED INTHREESTRATEGICAND HIGHLYVISIBLE PLACESINTHEBARANGAY
.
Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY
OATH OF OFFICE
Pursuant to Chapter 7, Title One, Book II, Local Government Code of 1991(Republic Act No. 7160), I _______________, being duly qualified andhaving been duly appointed MEMBER of the Lupong Tagapamayapa of thisBarangay, do hereby solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully andconscientiously discharge to the best of my ability, my duties and functions assuch member and as member of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo in which Imay be chosen to serve; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to theRepublic of the Philippines; that I will support and defend its Constitution andobey the laws, legal orders and decrees promulgated by its duly constitutedauthorities; and that I voluntarily impose upon myself this obligation withoutany mental reservation or purpose of evasion.
SO HELP ME GOD. (In case of affirmation the last sentence will be omitted.)_____________
Member
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to (or AFFIRMED) before me this _____ dayof __________, 20____.
__________________Punong Barangay
16
A H A N D B O O K
WHATISTHETERM OFOFFICEOFEACH LUPONMEMBER
?
ARETHE LUPONMEMBERSENTITLEDTOSOMECOMPENSATION
?
DOTHEY HAVEBENEFITS DUETOTHEM
?
UPON APPOINTMENT
,
EACHLUPON MEMBER SHALLSERVEFOR THREE
(
3
)
YEARSUNLESSTERMINATED BY DEATH
,
RESIGNATION
,
TRANSFEROFRESIDENCE ORPLACE OFWORK
,
OR WITHDRAWALOF
APPOINTMENT BY THE PUNONGBARANGAY
.
HOWEVER
,
THEWITHDRAWAL SHOULDBECONCURRED WITH A MAJORITYOF ALLTHE MEMBERS OFLUPON
. (
SEE KP FORM 6
)
THE LUPON MEMBERS SHALLSERVE WITHOUTANYCOMPENSATION
.
IFTHEBARANGAY HASENOUGHFUNDS
,
WECANALWAYS GIVEHONORARIA TOLUPON
MEMBERS WHOHAVEPARTICIPATED INTHE
RESOLUTION OFA PARTICULARCASE
.
ON THE OTHERHAND
,
UNDER COMMISSION ONHIGHER EDUCATION
(
CHED
)
ORDER 62SERIESOF 1997
,
TWO DAUGHTERSOR SONS OFA LUPONMEMBER ARE
QUALIFIED TOBECOME ASTATE SCHOLAR INTERTIARYEDUCATION TOANY STATECOLLEGES OR UNIVERSITIES
.
17
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
______ , 20__ (Date)
WITHDRAWAL OF APPOINTMENT
TO: _______________
After due hearing and with the concurrence of a majority of all the LupongTagapamayapa members of this Barangay, your appointment as memberthereof is hereby withdrawn effective upon receipt hereof, on the followingground/s:
[ ] incapacity to discharge the duties of your office as shown by_______________________________
[ ] unsuitability by reason of _______________________________(Check whichever is applicable and detail or specify the act/s oromission/s constituting the ground/s for withdrawal.)
____________________________Punong Barangay/Lupon ChairmanCONFORME (Signatures):1. __________________ 7. _________________2. __________________ 8. _________________3. __________________ 9. _________________4. __________________ 10. _________________5. __________________ 11. _________________6. __________________
Received this __________ day of _____________, 19____.__________________
SignatureNOTE:
The members of the Lupon conforming to the withdrawal must personallyaffix their signatures or thumb marks on the pertinent spaces above. Thewithdrawal must be conformed to by more than one-half of the total numberof members of the Lupon including the Punong Barangay and the memberconcerned.
18
A H A N D B O O KGOODTOHEAR
!…
ATLEASTTHEIRCOMMIT
-MENTAND SERVICESAREMORE OR LESS COMPEN
-SATED
.
WHERE CAN WESOURCE OTHER FUNDSFORTHELUPONOPERATIONSASIDEFROMBARANGAYFUNDS
?
WE CANALWAYS ASKTHE MUNICIPAL
GOVERNMENT FORSOMEALLOCATION REGARDINGTHE OPERATIONSOFLUPONAND INCLUDEIT INITS
ANNUALBUDGET
.
BACK TOMY ROLEASACHAIRPERSONOFLUPON
,
ARETHEREANY SPECIFIC
FUNCTIONSRELATED TOADMINISTERINGBARANGAYJUSTICE
?
HOWCAN IINVOLVEMYSANGGUNIANG
BARANGAYINBARANGAY JUSTICEADMINISTRATION
?
INDEED
,
YOUR ROLEASCHAIRPERSONOF LUPONISVERY CRUCIAL
.
HOWEVER
,
WECAN DISCUSSIT AS WEGOALONG WITH THEDIFFERENTWAYSOFRESOLVING
DISPUTESORCONFLICTS INYOUR BARANGAY
…
WELL
,
THE SANGGUNIANGBARANGAYHASTHE DUTY TO
PROVIDETHE ADMINIS
-TRATIVENEEDS OFTHE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPAAND THE PANGKAT
TAGAPAGKASUNDO BYALLOCATING FUNDSFROM THEINTERNALREVENUE ALLOTMENTFORTHE KATARUNGANGPAMBARANGAY
.
19
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
OK
,
NOW PLEASE TELL MEWHAT ISTHEFIRST STEPOF RESOLVING
CONFLICT ORDISPUTE INMY
BARANGAY
?
HAVEYOUR COFFEE
,
FIRSTAND YOURMANANGSOLING ISPREPARINGBOILED SWEETPOTATOESAND SABA
MEDIATION
THROUGH
THE
PUNONG
BARANGAY
C H A P T E R T W O
WHAT IFONLY ONEOF THEINVOLVEDPARTIESARE FROMMY BARANGAY
?
INTHIS CASE
,
THE DISPUTEWILLBE SETTLEDIN THEBARANGAY WHERE THE
RESPONDENTS ORONE OFTHERESPONDENTS RESIDE AT THECHOICEOFTHE COMPLAINANT
.
ISTHATCLEARTO YOU
?
ASPUNONGBARANGAY
,
YOU HAVEAN
AUTHORITY ORPOWERTOMEDIATECASES OFTHERESIDENTS INYOUR BARANGAY
.
YES
,
KAPITAN
.
WHATWOULDIDOIFTHEREWILLBECASES PRESENTEDTOMEIN THEBARANGAY
?
HOWCANIHELP INRESOLVINGIT
?
THIS SABAISSO SWEET
.
REALLY
?
THANKSFOR THECOMPLI
-MENTS
!
WHATIS YOURQUESTIONAGAIN
?
21
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G AY
WELL
,
HE
/
SHE SHOULDBE
REPRESENTED BYA LEGAL GUARDIANORNEXTOF KINWHOISNOTALAWYER
.
CANIMEDIATECASESINVOLVINGCOOPERATIVESORPEOPLE
’
SORGANIZATIONOPERATINGINMYBARANGAY
?
NO
,
IDON
’
TTHINKSO
.
AJURIDICAL PERSONORCORPORATION
LIKEA COOPERATIVECANNOTFILEA COMPLAINTBECAUSEIT ISNOTA PARTYTOAMICABLE
SETTLEMENT
.
ANY CASEINVOLVINGCOOPERATIVEORPEOPLE
’
SORGANIZATION CANGODIRECTLY TOCOURT WITHOUTGOING THROUGHMEDIATIONORCONCILIATION
.
SOWHAT ARETHE CASESUNDER THE KATARUNGANGPAMBARANGAY
?
ALL DISPUTES
,
CIVILANDCRIMINALIN NATUREWHEREPARTIESACTUALLY RESIDE INTHE SAMECITY OR
MUNICIPALITY ARE
SUBJECTED TO PROCEEDINGSOFAMICABLE SETTLEMENT
.
THERE ARECASES THATFALLUNDER OUR JURISDICTION
.
YES
,
NOW
,
WHATIFANY OFTHE INVOLVEDPARTIESISINCOMPETENT ORA MINOR
?
22
A H A N D B O O K
CASES UNDER KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAYUNLAWFUL USEOF MEANSOFPUBLICATIONANDUNLAWFUL
UTTERANCES
(
ART
.
154
);
ALARMSANDSCANDALS
(
ART
.
155
);
USINGFALSECERTIFICATES
(
ART
.
175
);
USING FICTITIOUSNAMESANDCONCEALINGTRUENAMES
(
ART
.
178
);
ILLEGALUSEOF UNIFORMSANDINSIGNIAS
(
ART
.
179
);
PHYSICALINJURIES INFLICTEDINA TUMULTUOUSAFFRAY
(
ART
.
252
);
GIVINGASSISTANCETOCONSUMMATEDSUICIDE
(
ART
.
253
);
RESPONSIBILITYOF PARTICIPANTSINADUEL IFONLYPHYSICALINJURIES AREINFLICTEDOR NOPHYSICALINJURIESHAVEBEENINFLICTED
(
ART
.
260
);
LESSSERIOUSPHYSICALINJURIES
(
ART
.
265
);
SLIGHTPHYSICALINJURIES ANDMALTREATMENT
(
ART
.
266
);
UNLAWFULARREST
(
ART
.
269
);
INDUCINGAMINOR TOABANDONHIS
/
HERHOME
(
ART
.
271
);
ABANDONMENT OFAPERSONINDANGERANDABANDONMENTOFONE
’
S OWNVICTIM
(
ART
.
275
);
ABANDONING AMINOR
(
ACHILDUNDERSEVEN[7] YEARSOLD
) (
ART
.
276
);
ABANDONMENT OFAMINOR BYPERONSENTRUSTEDWITHHIS
/
HERCUSTODY
;
INDIFFERENCEOFPARENTS
(
ART
.
277
);
QUALIFIEDTRESSPASS TODWELLING
(
WITHOUT THEUSEOFVIOLENCEANDINTIMIDATION
). (
ART
.
280
);
OTHERFORMSOFTRESSPASS
(
ART
.
281
);
LIGHTTHREATS
(
ART
.
283
);
OTHERLIGHT THREATS
(
ART
.
285
);
GRAVECOERCION
(
ART
.
286
);
LIGHTCOERCION
(
ART
.
287
);
OTHER SIMILARCOERCIONS
(
COMPULSORY PURCHASEOFMERCHANDISEANDPAYMENTOF WAGESBYMEANSOFTOKENS
). (
ART
.
288
);
23.FORMATION
,
MAINTENANCEAND PROHIBITIONOFCOMBINATION OFCAPITALOR LABORTHROUGHVIOLENCEORTHREATS
(
ART
.
289
);
23
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
DISCOVERING SECRETSTHROUGHSEIZURE ANDCORRESPONDENCE
(
ART
.
290
);
REVEALINGSECRETSWITHABUSEOF AUTHORITY
(
ART
.
291
);
THEFT
(
IFTHE VALUEOF THEPROPERTYSTOLEN DOESNOTEXCEEDP50.00
). (
ART
.
309
);
QUALIFIEDTHEFT
(
IFTHEAMOUNT DOESNOTEXCEEDP500
). (
ART
.
310
);
OCCUPATIONOF REALPROPERTYOR USURPATIONOF REALRIGHTSINPROPERTY
(
ART 312
);
ALTERINGBOUNDARIESOR LANDMARKS
(
ART
.
313
);
SWINDLINGOR ESTAFA
(
IFTHE AMOUNTDOESNOTEXCEEDP200.00
). (
ART
.
315
);
OTHERFORMSOFSWINDLING
(
ART
.
316
);
SWINDLINGAMINOR
(
ART
.
317
);
OTHERDECEITS
(
ART
.
318
);
REMOVAL
,
SALE OR PLEDGEOFMORTGAGEDPROPERTY
(
ART
.
319
);
SPECIAL CASESOF MALICIOUSMISCHIEF
(
IFTHEVALUEOFTHEDAMAGEDPROPERTYDOESNOT EXCEEDP1,000.00
).
(
ART 328
);
OTHER MISCHIEFS
(
IFTHEVALUE OFTHEDAMAGEDPROPERTYDOESNOTEXCEED P1,000.00
). (
ART
.
329
);
SIMPLESEDUCTION
(
ART
.
338
);
ACTSOF LASCIVIOUSNESSWITHTHECONSENT OFTHEOFFENDEDPARTY
(
ART 339
);
THREATENING TOPUBLISH ANDOFFERTO PREVENTSUCHPUBLICATIONFORCOMPENSATION
(
ART
.
356
);
PROHIBITINGPUBLICATION OF ACTSREFERRED TOINTHECOURSEOFOFFICIALPROCEEDINGS
(
ART
.
357
);
INCRIMINATINGINNOCENTPERSONS
(
ART
.
363
);
INTRIGUINGAGAINSTHONOR
(
ART
.
364
);
ISSUINGCHECKS WITHOUT SUFFICIENTFUNDS
(
BP22
);
FENCING OFSTOLEN PROPERTIES IFTHE PROPERTYINVOLVEDISNOTMORETHAN P50.00
(
PD1612
).
24
A H A N D B O O K
MY
GOODNESS
!
THAT
’
SA LOT
!
WHATOTHERCASES ARE EXEMPTEDIN KATARUNGANGPAMBARANGAY ASIDEFROMTHATOF AJURIDICAL PERSON ORCORPORATION
?
OFFENSESINVOLVINGGOVERNMENT ENTITY
;
OFFENSESWITH MAXIMUM
PENALTYOF1 YEARAND EXCEEDING FINE FIVETHOUSAND
(
P5,000.00
);
OFFENSESWITH NO PRIVATEPARTY
;
REAL PROPERTIESINDIFFERENTCITIES ORMUNICIPALITIES
,
DISPUTESTHAT NEEDURGENTLEGAL ACTION
,
LABOR DISPUTES
,
LAND DISPUTESAND ACTION TOANNULA JUDGMENTUPON ACOMPROMISE
.
WHATWILL BETHE FIRSTSTEPIN MEDIATINGCASES
?
OK
.
THE COMPLAINANT
,
WITH THE HELPOF YOURSECRETARY
,
WILLFILL UPKP FORM 7
.
A MINIMALFILING FEE ISBEING CHARGED
AND
PAID TOTHEBARANGAY TREASURER
.
IT ISALSO VERYIMPORTANT TO
NOTETHAT NO INDIVIDUAL CAN
GO DIRECTLYTOCOURT OR ANYGOVERNMENT OFFICEFORADJUDICATION OF HIS
/
HERDISPUTE WITH ANOTHERINDIVIDUAL ESPECIALLYIFTHEMATTER ISWITHIN YOURJURISDICTION
.
25
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
___________________ Barangay Case No. ___________________________________ For: ____________________________ Complainant/s________________________________________________________________ — against —____________________________________ Respondent/sC O M P L A I N T
I/WE hereby complain against above named respondent/s for violating my/ourrights and interests in the following manner:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
THEREFORE, I/WE pray that the following relief/s be granted to me/us inaccordance with law and/or equity:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Made this _______ day of ___________, 19____.________________
Complainant/s
Received and filed this ________ day of __________, 19____.____________________________
Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman
26
A H A N D B O O K
YOU MEAN
,
THE CONCERNEDPARTIESMUST GOTHROUGHTHE KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
?
ISEE
…
ARE WENOTACTINGLIKEA COURT ANDTHELUPON ASJUDGES
?
OK
,
NOW AFTER THE
COMPLAINANT HASPAIDTHEFILING FEE
,
WHATIS THENEXTSTEP
?
YES
,
EXCEPTWHEN THEPARTIES
PERSONALLYCONFRONTED EACH OTHERAND SETTLETHEIR DISPUTE
.
BUTIFNOT
,
THEY SHOULDGOTHROUGHTHE
CONCILIATORY PROCEEDINGSORELSETHE COURTS
CANSIMPLY DISMISS FOR LACK
OF CAUSE OF ACTION OR
PREMATURITY
.
NO
,
WE ARENOT
.
THEBASICDISTINCTION IN OURWORKAS LUPONISTHAT IT ISNOT ABARANGAY COURT ANDLUPONMEMBERS ARE NOTJUDGES
.
IT IS A
CONCILIATIONBODYANDTHE MEMBERS ARECONCILIATORS
.
INYOURCASE
,
YOU ARE THEMEDIATOR
.
WITHINTHREE
(
3
)
DAYS
,
YOU SHOULDISSUE ANOTICEOFHEARING TOTHECOMPLAINANTAND SUMMONTHERESPONDENT BOTHOFWHOMSHOULDAPPEAR INYOUR OFFICE
.
27
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
WHATIFANYOFTHE PARTIESFAILEDTOAPPEAR
?
IFTHECOMPLAINANT CANNOT APPEAR BEFOREYOU
WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLECAUSE
,
HIS
/
HER
COMPLAINTWILL BEDISMISSED ANDEVENTUALLYHE
/
SHE CANNOT FILE ACASE INCOURT
.
HE CAN
ALSO BEPUNISHED
/
REPRIMANDEDFORINDIRECTCONTEMPT
.
HOWEVER
,
IF
THE RESPONDENT CANNOT ALSO APPEAR WITHOUT
JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE
,
HIS
/
HERCOUNTERCLAIM IF
THEREISANY
,
WILL BEDISMISSED AND HE WILLBEBARREDFROMFILING INCOURT AND BEPUNISHEDFORINDIRECTCONTEMPT OFCOURT
.
Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
NOTICE OF HEARING(MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS)
TO: _________________ ________________Complainant/s
You are hereby required to appear before me on the ______ day of _______,19___ at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for the hearing of yourcomplaint.
This ________ day of ____________, 19____.____________________________
Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman
Notified this ________ day of __________, 19____.complainant/s
______________________________
28
A H A N D B O O K
THEIR CASE BUT YOU WILL HELP THEM RESOLVE
THEIR CASE
.
AS MEDIATOR
,
YOU WILLLISTEN
TOTHEM CAREFULLY AND HELPTHEM FINDTHE
WHATIFBOTHOFTHEM APPEAR
?
HOWWILL IRESOLVETHEIR CASES
?
CORRECTION
,
YOU WILL NOT RESOLVE
Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA___________________ Barangay Case No. ___________________________________ For: ____________________________ Complainant/s________________________________________________________________ — against —____________________________________ Respondent/sS U M M O N STO: ____________________ _____________________________________________ _________________________Respondents
You are hereby summoned to appear before me in person, together with yourwitnesses, on the _______ day of _________, 19___ at ____________o’clock in the morning/afternoon, then and there to answer to a complaintmade before me, copy of which is attached hereto, for mediation/conciliationof your dispute with complainant/s.
You are hereby warned that if you refuse or willfully fail to appear inobedience to this summons, you may be barred from filing any counterclaimarising from said complaint.
FAIL NOT or else face punishment as for contempt of court.This _______ day of ____________, 19___.
_____________________________Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman
29
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
SOLUTIONWITHIN 15 DAYS
.
IFTHE RESPONDENTDOESNOTAPPEAR
,
THECASE WILL BEREFERRED TOTHEPANGKATTAPAGPAGKASUNDO
.
NOW
,
BEFORE IASKFURTHER ONTHE PANGKAT
,
ASTHE PUNONGBARANGAY
,
WHATWILL IDO INHANDLINGTHEIR CASES PROPERLY
?
BEFORE THE ACTUALMEDIATION
,
ITIS NECESSARYFORYOU TOKNOWTHE
PARTIES INVOLVEDAND THEIRDIFFERENCES
.
OFFICER’S RETURN
I served this summons upon respondent ____________________________ onthe ______ day of ______________, 19____, and upon respondent
___________________________ on the day of ________________, 19____,by:
(Write name/s of respondent/s before mode by which he/they was/wereserved.)
Respondent/s
__________________________ 1. handing to him/them saidsummons in person, or__________________________ 2. handing to him/them said
summons and he/they refused toreceive it, or
__________________________ 3. leaving said summons at his/theirdwelling with __________ (name)a person of suitable age anddiscretion residing therein, or__________________________ 4. leaving said summons at his/their
office/place of business with________, ( name) a competentperson in charge thereof._____________
Officer
Received by Respondent/s representative/s:
___________________ __________________Signature Date___________________ __________________
Signature Date
30
A H A N D B O O K
IT SEEMSTOBESOEASY
…
IT ISAVERY TEDIOUSPROCESS THAT NEEDSAGREAT DEAL OFRESPECTAND LISTENING
.
REMEMBERYOU ARE A NOTAJUDGEBUTA MEDIATOR
…
LET BOTH PARTIESFINDA SOLUTIONTOTHEIR DISPUTE
.
YES
,
BUT IT SHOULDBEIN
A LANGUAGEOR
DIALECT
KNOWNTO
PARTIES
.
SOIFTHEY AGREEDTOHAVE
SETTLEMENT
,
SHOULDWEPUTINTO WRITING THETERMSAND CONDITION OFTHEIR SETTLEMENT
?
IT ISVERYIMPORTANT TOEXPLAINTHEPROCESS AND OBJECTIVES OFTHEMEDIATIONAND THE RULESTOBEOBSERVEDDURING THE MEDIATION
.
IT ISBETTERIFYOUCOULDSTART THEWHOLEPROCESS WITHAPRAYER
…
GIVEEACHPARTY TIME TOEXPLAINTHEIR SIDE
WITHOUT INTERRUPTIONFROMTHEOTHER PARTY
.
ASKQUESTIONS ANDINVOLVEBOTH PARTIES
INLOOKINGFORTHE SOLUTIONOFTHEIR DISPUTES
.
THEN
,
WHATWILL IDO
?
ISTHERE A
31
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA___________________ Barangay Case No. ___________________________________ For: ____________________________ Complainant/s________________________________________________________________ — against —____________________________________ Respondent/sAMICABLE SETTLEMENT
We, complainant/s and respondent/s in the above-captioned case, do herebyagree to settle our dispute as follows:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
and bind ourselves to comply honestly and faithfully with the above terms ofsettlement.
Entered into this ______ day of __________, 19_______.Complainant/s Respondent/s
___________________ _____________________________________ __________________
ATTESTATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing amicable settlement was entered into by theparties freely and voluntarily, after I had explained to them the nature andconsequence of such settlement.
______________________________Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman
KP FORM # 16: AMICABLE SETTLEMENT
HOWCAN WEBE ENSUREDTHAT THEAGREEMENT WILLBE COMPLIED
?
AFTER 10 DAYS
,
THE SETTLEMENTWILL BEEXECUTORY AND IT HASTHEFORCEAND
EFFECTOFA DECISIONOFA COURT
.
32
A H A N D B O O K
INTHAT CASE
,
ANYPARTY CANPROTEST THESETTLEMENT WITHIN10 DAYS
.
FORAFTER 10 DAYS
,
THE SETTLEMENTWILLTAKEEFFECT
.
HE
/
SHE CANVOLUNTARYCOMPLY WITHTHE SETTLEMENTWITHIN 5DAYS
.
HOWEVER
,
IFHE
/
SHEFAILS
,
THEN
,
WE CANTAKE HIS
/
HERPROPERTYASPRESCRIBED BY LAW
.
WE CANDISCUSS THATFURTHER LATER
.
HOWCAN THERESPONDENTCOMPLY WITHTHE SETTLEMENT
?
WHATIFMYMEDIATIONFAILS ANDNOSETTLEMENT ISEVERREACHED
?
ISTHERE ANYWAY THATTHE PARTIESCANSETTLE THEIRDISPUTES
?
YES
,
OFCOURSE
.
OURCULTUREPROVIDESQUITEA NUMBEROFWAYS OFRESOLVINGDISPUTES
.
ONEOFTHESEIS RESOLVINGTHROUGHA GROUP OFCONCILIATORS KNOWNAND RESPECTED BYBOTHPARTIES
…
INTHE CODE
,
WECALL THISPANGKATTAGAPAGKASUNDO
.
WHATIFANY OF
DISPUTANT WASFORCEDTOCOMEUP WITH THE
SETTLEMENTTHROUGHFRAUD
,
THREATORINTIMIDATION
?
CONCILIATION
THROUGH
THE
PANGKAT
TAGAPAGSUNDO
C H A P T E R T H R E E
KAP
,
WHATIF
,
IHAVEDONEMY BESTIN MEDIATIONYETTHE PARTIESHAVENOT
COMETOAN AMICABLE
SETTLEMENT
.
CAN
THEYNOW ELE
VATETHE CASE
TOTHE
COURT
?
NO
!
THEPARTIESSTILLHAVE TOGOTOTHECONCILIATIONPROCEEDINGS
.
MEDIATIONAND CONCILIATIONPROCESSES ARETHE SAME EXCEPTMEDIATIONISDONE BY THEPUNONGBARANGAY WHIETHE
LATTER
IS
DONE BYTHEPANGKATHEADED BYACHAIRPERSON
.
JUSTLIKEMEDIATION
,
WHATIS THEPROCESS OFCONCILIATION
?
YOU
,
ASTHE PUNONGBARANGAYWILLCONSTITUTETHEPANGKAT NGTAGPAGSUNDOWITHIN15 DAYSFROMTHE LASTDAYOF THEMEDIATIONPROCEEDINGS
.
BEFORE THAT
,
HOWDOESCONCILIATIONDIFFERFROM
34
A H A N D B O O KRepublic of the Philippines
Province of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY
NOTICE FOR CONSTITUTION OF PANGKAT
TO: __________________ ______________________________________ ____________________Complainant/s Respondent/s
You are hereby required to appear before me on the ______ day of_________, 19____, at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for theconstitution of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo which shall conciliate yourdispute. Should you fail to agree on the Pangkat membership or to appear onthe aforesaid date for the constitution of the Pangkat, I shall determine themembership thereof by drawing lots.
This ________ day of ____________, 19_____.____________________
Punong Barangay
Notified this _________ day of _________, 19_____.
TO: __________________ _____________________________________ ____________________Complainant/s Respondent/s
KP FORM # 10: NOTICE FOR CONSTITUTION OF PANGKAT
CONCILIATIONISMERELY INTERVENINGBETWEEN TWOORMORECONTENDING PARTIESINORDER TOPREVENTOR PUT ANEND TODISPUTEWITHOUT AN AGREEMENTTO ABIDEBY THEDECISION OFTHECONCILIATOR
.
WHOCANBEMEMBERS OFTHEPANGKAT
?
THETHREE MEMBERS SHALLCOME FROMTHE LUPON ANDWILL BECHOSEN BYBOTH PARTIES
,
THECOMPLAINANT ANDTHE RESPONDENT
.
35
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA___________________ Barangay Case No. ___________________________________ For: ____________________________ Complainant/s________________________________________________________________ — against —____________________________________Respondent/s
NOTICE TO CHOSEN PANGKAT MEMBER
(Date)TO: ________________
Notice is hereby given that you have been chosen member of the Pangkat ngTagapagkasundo amicably conciliate the dispute between the par in the above-entitled case.
____________________________Punong Barangay/Lupon Secretary
Received this ________ day of __________, 19_____.________________
Pangkat Member
KP FORM # 11: NOTICE TO CHOSEN PANGKAT MEMBER
WHATIFTHE PARTIESFAILTOAGREE ON THEPANGKAT MEMBERSHIP
?
YOU
,
AGAINAS THELUPON CHAIRPERSONWILLDETERMINE THE 3 MEMBERS BY
DRAWINGLOTS TOBEDISTRIBUTEDTO THEMEMBERS OFPANGKAT
.
36
A H A N D B O O K
HOW DOWE FILLVACANCY OFPANGKAT
?
IF THE PANGKATDECIDESTO DISQUALIFYANY OFITSMEMBERS
,
THE PARTIESSHOULD AGREE ONA COMMONCHOICEFORTHE REPLACEMENT
.
IFTHEY FAILTOAGREE
,
THE LUPONCHAIRPERSONSHALL
FILL THE RESULTINGVACANCY BYDRAWINGOFLOTS
.
INCASE OFVACANCY DUETO OTHERCAUSES
,
THEPUNONGBARANGAY ORTHE LUPONCHAIRPERSONSHALLINA
SIMILARMANNER
,
FILLS SUCHVACANCYSHOULD THEPARTYFAILTOAGREE ONA
COMMON CHOICE
.
AFTER THE PANGKATMEMBERS HAVE BEENCHOSEN
,
WHATWILLTHEY DO
?
THEY SHALLELECT FROMAMONGTHEMSELVESA CHAIRPERSON
AND A SECRETARY
.
THE LUPONSECRETARY SHALLGIVE
/
TURN
OVER ALLRECORDS OFTHE CASETOTHE PANGKATSECRETARY FOR
THE PANGKATTO STUDY
.
SIMILAR TOTHE MEMBERSHIPOFLUPON
,
CANWE ALSODISQUALIFYUNFIT MEMBER
/
SOF THEPANGKAT
?
RELATIONSHIP
,
BIAS
,
INTEREST OFOTHERSIMILARGROUNDS DISCOVEREDAFTER THE CONSTITUTION OFPANGKAT CANBEGROUNDSFORDISQUALIFICATIONOFPANGKAT MEMBER
.
THEPANGKAT SHALLRESOLVETHEMATTER BYA MAJORITY VOTE
.
ITSDECISION ON THISMATTER ISFINAL
.
37
K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y
OH
!
THIS ISCLEARER TOME NOW
.
BUTDURINGTHE FIRSTMEETING
,
WHATISTHE IMMEDIATEGOALAND HOW DOESTHE
PANGKATPROCEEDWITH ITS TASKS
?
THE PANGKATSHALLMEET TOHEAR BOTHPARTIES
,
EXPLORE POSSIBILITIESFOR AMICABLESETTLEMENTWITHIN 15DAYS
WHICHCANBE EXTENDEDFORANOTHER 15 DAYSIN A MERITORIOUSCASE AND
ISSUE SUBPOENA OFWITNESSES WHENEVER NECESSARY
.
Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________
CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA___________________ Barangay Case No. ___________________________________ For: ____________________________ Complainant/s________________________________________________________________ — against —____________________________________ Respondent/sS U B P O E N ATO: ____________________ _____________________________________________ _________________________ Witnesses
You are hereby commanded to appear before me on the ______ day of_________, 19___, at ___________ o’clock, then and there to testify in thehearing of the above-captioned case.
This ______ day of _________, 19____._______________________________Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman(Cross out whichever one is not applicable).