Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook (2024)

Table of Contents
A H A N D B O O K KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook Maricel Vigo Atty. Marlon Manuel, SALIGAN Atty. Marlon Manuel, SALIGAN Divina Lopez, LGSP Myn Garcia, LGSP Vic Alfaro, LGSP Edgar Catalan, LGSP Raissa Jajurie, SALIGAN Mindanao Raymond Salas, SALIGAN Mindanao Pedrito Acosta, Region 12 Liza del Norte, IPHC Allan Carpio, RCED Arnold Beroya A H A N D B O O K KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook Copyright © 2004 Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) All rights reserved The Philippines- Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) encourages the use, translation, and adaptation and copying of this material for non-commercial use, with appropriate credit given to LGSP. Although reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this handbook, neither the publisher and/or contributor and/or writer can accept any liability for any consequence arising from the use thereof or from any information contained herein. ISBN 971-92952-0-1 Printed and bound in Manila, Philippines Published by: Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal (SALIGAN) 1/F Hoffner Bldg., Social Development Complex Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, 1108 Quezon City, Philippines ✆ (632) 4266001 local 4858 or 4860 Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) Unit 1507 Jollibee Plaza Emerald Avenue, 1600 Pasig City, Philippines ✆ (632) 637 3511-13 www.lgsp.org.ph This project was undertaken with the financial support of the Government of Canada provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). IMPLEMENTED BY A JOINT PROJECT OF Foreword Acknowledgements Preface Definition of Terms Introduction 1 : Chapter 1 — Constitution of the Lupon Chapter 2 — Mediation through the Punong Barangay Chapter 3 — Conciliation through the Pangkat Tagapagkasundo Chapter 4 — Arbitration Chapter 5 — Indigenous Modes of Dispute Resolution 2 : , Chapter 1 — Scholarships Chapter 2 — Incentives and Awards Annexes — Katarungang Pambarangay Forms KP Form # 1 KP Form # 2 KP Form # 3 KP Form # 4 KP Form # 5 KP Form # 6 KP Form # 7 KP Form # 8 KP Form # 9 KP Form # 10 KP Form # 11 KP Form # 12 KP Form #13 KP Form #14 CONTENTS vii ix xi xiii 1 9 20 33 52 58 69 73 Notice to Constitute the Lupon Appointment Letter Notice of Appointment List of Appointed Lupon Members Lupon Member Oath Statement Withdrawal of Appointment Complainant’s Form Notice of Hearing Summon for the Respondent Notice for Constitution of Pangkat Notice to Chosen Pangkat Member Notice of Hearing (Conciliation Proceedings) Subpoena Letter KP Form # 15 KP Form # 16 KP Form # 17 KP Form # 18 KP Form # 19 KP Form # 20 KP Form # 21 KP Form # 22 KP Form # 23 KP Form # 24 KP Form # 25 KP Form # 26 KP Form # 27 KP Form # 28 Arbitration Award Amicable Settlement Repudiation Notice of Hearing for Complainant Notice of Hearing for Respondent Certification to File Action (from Lupon Secretary) Certification to File Action (from Pangkat Secretary) Certification to File Action Certification to Bar Action Certification to Bar Counterclaim Motion for Execution Notice of Hearing (Re: Motion for Execution Notice of Execution IT has always been a source of pride for us in the Department of the Interior and Local Government to bear witness to outstanding initiatives of partners in local governance. We are therefore pleased to acknowledge the latest publication of the Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP), Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook. Republic Act 7160, otherwise known as the 1991 Local Government Code, gives barangays the mandate to enforce peace and order and provide support for the effective enforcement of human rights and justice. Decentralization has facilitated the recognition of the Katarungang Pambarangay or Barangay Justice System as an alternative venue for the resolution of disputes. The challenge facing local governments now is to maximize and harness the katarungang pambarangay as one of the most valuable mechanisms available in administering justice, advancing human rights protection and resolving and/or mediating conflict at the barangay level through non-adversarial means. Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook provides local governments an easy-to-use tool with which to take up this challenge. It fills the need to increase the awareness and understanding of katarungang pambarangay and its value as an empowering and alternative tool for the resolution of community and family disputes at the barangay level. With the fast-evolving demand for access to justice, there is a need to utilize this mechanism more strategically and proactively as a way to promote peace at the grassroots. The Punong Barangay (Barangay Heads), members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa (Peace Council) and communities will FOREWORD benefit greatly from this publication. Moreover, development workers, the academe and non-governmental and people’s organizations will also find this handbook useful in their work on barangay justice. This undertaking complements the efforts of the DILG to popularize and mainstream governance knowledge products through the Local Government Academy and the agency’s regional learning centers. The handbook provides a means for improved access to dispute resolutions and will go a long way towards enhancing knowledge on and strengthening barangay governance and justice. The DILG, therefore, congratulates the Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program for its commitment and meaningful contributions to promoting excellence in barangay governance as an integral element of good, responsive and accountable local governance. HON. JOSE D. LINA JR. Secretary Department of the Interior and Local Government THE support, collaboration and creative contributions of the following individuals and institutions are invaluable and were essential to the completion of this publication: The Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program led by Alix Yule and Marion Maceda Villanueva for providing the necessary direction and support The Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal (SALIGAN), especially Atty. Marlon J. Manuel, for their partnership Maricel Vigo for the overall writeup and excellent technical contribution LGSP Area Managers Tess Gajo, Merlinda Hussein, Evelyn ji*z and LGSP Program Officers namely Vic Alfaro, Edgar Catalan, Abduljim Hassan and Cris Tagupa for their invaluable collaboration LGSP Local Resource Partners Raissa Jajurie and Raymond Salas of SALIGAN Mindanao, Pedrito Acosta (Reg 12), Liza del Norte of Institute of Primary Health Care (IPHC), Allan Carpio of Resource Center for Empowerment and Development (RCED) for their technical contribution Divina Luz Lopez for her overall project management and technical expertise in ensuring the quality of this publication Myn Garcia for providing technical and creative direction, and overall supervision of the design, layout and production ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Arnold Beroya for the illustrations and Alecks Pabico for layout and overall art direction Raymond Oliveros, Janilo Rubiato and Tess Tajanlangit for the translation of the handbook to Tagalog, Cebuano and Ilonggo, respectively Ria Adapon and Sef Carandang for overall coordination and editorial work Gigi Barazon and the rest of the LGSP administrative staff for providing support. KATARUNGANG Pambarangay: A Handbook is the latest publication of the Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) as part of its mandate to mainstream effective and responsive barangay governance. Republic Act 7160 or the Local Government Code of 1991 expanded the scope and powers of the Katarungang Pambarangay or the Barangay Justice System designed not merely to decongest the courts of cases but to address inequalities in access to justice, particularly experienced by marginalized communities. The barangays, being the basic political unit in the country, is in the most strategic position to facilitate resolution or mediation of community and family disputes, alongside its mandate to deliver basic services. In empowering local government units in Western Visayas and Mindanao, LGSP has designed initiatives that strengthen barangay governance, including enhancing and mainstreaming the use of and access to the barangay justice system. The Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook was designed to provide a user-friendly, easy to read and simple tool to promote the knowledge of the katarungang pambarangay as an effective alternative mechanism for dispute resolution. This handbook aims to increase the understanding of the Punong Barangays (barangay heads) and members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa (Barangay Peace Council) on the processes and procedures of the barangay justice system to enable them to maximize its use in their communities. It is also intended to provide a practical overview for the PREFACE members of the communities — paralegals, non-government and people’s organizations — regarding the role and benefits of the katarungang pambarangay in their lives. By doing so, LGSP hopes that it would somehow make a difference in people’s lives by contributing to a better understanding and strategic administration of the barangay justice system. Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook is a modest contribution to creating greater awareness of an alternative to what can be an elitist and complex legal system, often characterized by an arduous legal process. This publication is a way to empower grassroots communities to exact their basic rights and provide them a viable way to do so. The Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program Adjudication is the power of courts or quasi-judicial agencies to decide cases filed before them and falling within their jurisdiction. Amicable Settlement is an agreement reached during mediation and conciliation proceedings. Arbitration is a process wherein the third party from outside the judicial system is chosen by parties to hear and decide their dispute. Arbitration Award is the decision reached by either the lupon chairperson or pangkat, as the case may be, upon prior agreement in writing by the parites to a dispute for the adjudicators to resolve it. Attachment is a provisional remedy in the form of an order issued by a judge before whom the case is pending by which the property is taken into legal custody as security for satisfaction of a judgment obtained by the prevailing party, either at the commencement of the action or any time after the filing of the case before the final judgment Complainant — plaintiff Complaint is a concise statement of ultimate facts constituting the plaintiff’s cause and causes of action. Conciliation is a process wherein the Pangkat forgoes the power to decide or recommend but assist the parties to isolate issues and options to reach a settlement by consensus that jointly satisfies their needs DEFINITION OF TERMS Delivery of Personal Property (Replevin) is provisional remedy by which a judge before whom an action is pending for the recovery of personal property issues an order for the delivery of such property to the movant or the party filing the petition upon filing of a bond to guarantee its return or to answer for the damages. Execution is the process of exacting satisfaction for on or both of the parties through compulsory or coercive means. It entails the enforcement of the terms of the amicable settlement or arbitration award in so far as this may enjoin or command any of the parties to perform an act, give something or refrain from doing some act Habeas Corpus is a judicial proceeding for the purpose of releasing a person who is illegally deprived of liberty or restoring rightful custody to the person who has been deprived of. Incompetent means a person who is suffering the penalty of civil interdiction; or who is a hospitalized leper, prodigal, deaf and dumb who is unable to communicate; one who is of unsound mind, even though he has a lucid intervals and a person not being unsound mind but by reason of age, disease, weak mind, and other similar causes, cannot, without outside aid, take care of himself and mange his property, becoming thereby an easy prey for deceit and exploitation. Jurisdiction is an authority to hear and decide a case and given by law and cannot be agreed by the parties Katarungang Barangay (KP) is a system of justice administered at the barangay level for the purpose of amicable settling disputes through mediation, conciliation or abitration among the family or barangay without resorting to the courts. Lupong Tagapamayapa (Lupon) is a body organized in every barangay composed of Punong Barangay as the chairperson and not less than ten (10) and more than twenty from which the members of every Pangkat shall be chosen. Mediation is a process wherein the Lupon chairperson or Barangay Chairperson assists the disputing parties to reach a settlement by consensus that jointly satisfies their needs. Minor is a person below eighteen (18) years of age. Next of Kin is an individual who is a relative or a responsible friend with whom the minor or incompetent lives Pangkat Tagapagkasundo (Pangkat) is a conciliation panel constituted from the Lupon membership for every dispute brought before the Lupon consisting of three (3) members after the Punong Barangay has failed in his mediation efforts. Preliminary injunction is a provisional remedy in the form of an order issued by a judge before whom the case is pending at any stage before the final judgment requiring a person to refrain from a particular act. Repudiation is an act of rejecting the validity or refusing to accept the terms and conditions of agreement on the ground of vitiation of consent by fraud, violence or intimidation. Respondent — defendant Statute of Limitations is the law which bars or does not allow the institution or filing of an action or case against another after the expiration of the period prescribe d for such action or offense Support Pendente Lite is a provisional remedy in a form of an order issued by a judge before whom the case is pending granting allowance, dwelling, clothing, education and medical attendance to the person entitled thereof. Venue is the place where the case is to be heard and decided. This is not fixed by law except in criminal cases, and can be agreed upon by the parties. INTRODUCTION THE Katarungang Pambarangay or Barangay Justice System is a community-based dispute settlement mechanism that is administered by the basic political unit of the country, the barangay. As a community-based mechanism for dispute resolution, it covers disputes between members of the same community (generally, same city/municipality) and involves the Punong Barangay and other members of the communities (the Lupon members) as intermediaries (mediators, conciliators, and, sometimes, arbitrators). The establishment and operation of the Barangay Justice System is mandated by Republic Act No. 7160 or the Local Government Code of 1991. Prior to this law, however, the establishment of the Barangay Justice System had been covered by Presidential Decree 1508 in 1978 and Batas Pambansa Blg. 337 or the 1983 Local Government Code. When PD 1508 first decreed the setting up of the Barangay Justice System, the law had the following objectives: To promote the speedy administration of justice To minimize the indiscriminate filing of cases in courts To minimize the congestion of court dockets and thereby enhance the quality of justice dispensed by the courts To perpetuate and recognize the time-honored tradition of amicably settling disputes at the community level 2 These same objectives are stated in the Katarungang Pambarangay Rules that were promulgated by the Department of Justice on June 1, 1992, pursuant to the mandate of the Local Government Code. These rules serve as the implementing rules for the provisions of the Local Government Code on the establishment, administration, and operation of the Barangay Justice System. Under the Barangay Justice System, the main strategy for settling disputes is to provide a venue for the disputing parties to search for a solution that is mutually acceptable. Hence, the primary role of the system is not to decide disputes and impose a solution on the parties but to assist the parties in discussing the possible amicable settlement of their disputes. The Punong Barangay and the community conciliators (Lupon members) do not act as judges or adjudicators of disputes but as facilitators for the disputing parties’ discussion of possible solutions. For this reason, the personal appearance and participation of the disputing parties is necessary, while the non-appearance of the parties will have corresponding sanctions. Also because of the need for the disputing parties’ personal participation in the conciliation proceedings, disputes involving non-natural persons like corporations are not subject to the conciliation proceedings of the Barangay Justice System. The Barangay Justice System provides an alternative mode for dispute resolution to the costly and lengthy process of settling Simply put, the Barangay Justice System provides a friendly, inexpensive, and speedy forum for the settlement of disputes where the parties can freely explore options for amicably resolving their disputes without resorting to the 3 disputes in regular courts. Instead of going through the very technical procedure of filing formal pleadings and presenting evidence in courts, the parties of a dispute are given the opportunity to try to talk to each other and resolve their disputes amicably. The technical processes and rules that are usually applied in court proceedings are not applied. Filing a case in court, or defending oneself against such a case, would necessarily entail the services of lawyers. In the Barangay Justice System, however, the parties do not need to secure the services of lawyers. In fact, the law prohibits the participation of lawyers in the conciliation proceedings. While cases that are tried in courts generally take years to be resolved, cases that go through the Barangay Justice System would generally take only a few weeks. Simply put, the Barangay Justice System provides a friendly, inexpensive, and speedy forum for the settlement of disputes where the parties can freely explore options for amicably resolving their disputes without resorting to the courts. On the issue of access to justice, the Barangay Justice System provides an accessible mechanism for resolving the justice issues of the poor. In some areas where the courts are inaccessible, both because of location and because of the prohibitive costs of litigation, the Barangay Justice System, with all its limitations, can be the only venue that the poor can avail of for the resolution of their disputes. In some areas where the courts are inaccessible, both because of location and because of the prohibitive costs of litigation, the Barangay Justice System, with all its limitations, can be the only venue that the poor can avail of for the resolution of their disputes. 4 The Barangay Justice System is also envisioned to complement the courts in administering justice. For cases that are covered by the Barangay Justice System, it is compulsory for the parties to go through the Barangay Justice System proceedings first before going to court. Failure to do so would mean the dismissal of the parties’ claim or counterclaim. It is only when the Barangay Justice System has failed to resolve the dispute that the parties will be allowed to bring their case to court. The Supreme Court issued Administrative Circular No. 14-93 on July 15, 1993 directing the courts to ensure compliance with the requirement of prior recourse to the Barangay Justice as a condition for filing a complaint in court for cases that are covered by the system. With more disputing parties settling their disputes at the community level, it is expected that the filing of cases between members of the same community will be minimized. This, in turn, will help reduce the congestion of the courts’ dockets and, hopefully, improve the efficiency and quality of the courts’ dispensation of justice. The Barangay Justice system is, thus, both an alternative and complementary mode of resolution to the court system. The Barangay Justice System maximizes the use of time-honored traditions and practices of communities in settling disputes between community members. Filipinos traditionally resort to the help of older members of the family, community elders, or tribe leaders in resolving disputes between members of the same family or community. This is the common practice that is recognized and formalized by the Barangay Justice System. In lieu of family members, community elders, or tribe leaders, the Barangay Justice System uses the Punong Barangay and the Lupon Members, who are appointed from the respected members of the 5 community. In recognition of traditional customary practices in some indigenous communities, the law on the Barangay Justice System provides that in communities that have distinct traditional practices of settling disputes, the customs and traditions of the indigenous cultural communities shall be applied. Thus, local systems of settling disputes through their councils of datus or elders are recognized and followed with the same force and effect as the procedure laid down in the law. The strength of the Barangay Justice System lies in the fact that it is based in the community itself, and is administered by community members using traditional practices in dispute resolution. With this set-up, the disputing parties are expected to be more comfortable in discussing their problems and in exploring solutions to the disputes. It is likewise expected that the community-based set-up of the Barangay Justice System will ensure that the parties will honor the amicable settlement that was agreed upon. Ultimately, the Barangay Justice System is envisioned to live up to its name. It is expected to ensure the dispensation of justice at the grassroots level. The first part of the handbook discusses the actual processes of the Katarungang Pambarangay (KP). The second part deals with the benefits, incentives and awards of the system. The Annexes contains samples of al the KP forms that are used in the process, for reference. The Supreme Court issued Administrative Circular No. 14-93 on July 15, 1993 directing the courts to ensure compliance with the requirement of prior recourse to the Barangay Justice as a condition for filing a complaint in court for cases that are covered by the system. 6 This handbook has also been translated to three Philippine dialects, namely Tagalog, Cebuano and Ilonggo, to facilitate greater use and understanding of the system at the community level. Also, a handbook on the Barangay Justice System in ARMM is being developed, which takes a look at the existing indigenous/traditional mechanisms of dispensing justice in the Muslim and Moro cultures. P A R T O N E ACTUAL PRACTICES . , . , , . , . . . . , . . ? , . CONSTITUTION OF THE LUPON - ... 10 / . ? ? ? ( ) , . . ? . ? , . / , 11 ? , : , , , , , , , - , . / : , , , , , , , - 18 12 . / . . , , - , ? , ? 13 14 , . , , . , ? STEP 1: Determining the actual number of Lupon Members STEP 2: Preparing a notice to constitute the Lupon STEP 3: Posting the notice to constitute the Lupon STEP 4: Appointment of Lupon Members STEP 5: Oath taking of Lupon members STEP 6: Posting , ? . 16 ? ? ? , ( ) , , , . , . ( ) . , . , ( ) , . 17 18 !… . ? . , ? ? , . , , . 19 , ? , MEDIATION THROUGH THE PUNONG BARANGAY ? , . ? , . , . ? ? . ? ! ? 21 , / . ? , . . . ? , . . , , ? 22 ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); / ( . ); ( . ); ( ) ( . ); / ; ( . ); ( ). ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( ). ( . ); , ( . ); 23 ( . ); ( . ); ( ). ( . ); ( ). ( . ); ( ); ( . ); ( ). ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); , ( . ); ( ). ( ); ( ). ( . ); ( . ); ( ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( . ); ( ); ( ). 24 ! ! ? ; ( ); ; , , , . ? . , , . . / . 25 26 , ? ? , , ? , . , . , . . . , . ( ) , . 27 ? , / / . / . , , / , . 28 . , ? ? , 29 . , . , , , ? , . 30 . . , . , ? . . . , ? 31 ? , . 32 , . , . / . , / , , / . . ? ? ? , . . , . , ? CONCILIATION THROUGH THE PANGKAT TAGAPAGSUNDO , , . ? ! . . , ? , . , 34 . ? , . 35 ? , . 36 ? , . , . , , . , ? . / . , / ? , , . . . 37 ! . , ? , .
(1)

A

H

A

N

D

B

O

O

K

KATARUNGANG

PAMBARANGAY

(2)

Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook

WRITERS

Maricel Vigo

Atty. Marlon Manuel, SALIGAN

TECHNICAL AND EDITORIALTEAM

Atty. Marlon Manuel, SALIGAN

Divina Lopez, LGSP

Myn Garcia, LGSP

Vic Alfaro, LGSP

Edgar Catalan, LGSP

Raissa Jajurie, SALIGAN Mindanao

Raymond Salas, SALIGAN Mindanao

Pedrito Acosta, Region 12

Liza del Norte, IPHC

Allan Carpio, RCED

ILLUSTRATIONSAND COVERDESIGN

Arnold Beroya

ART DIRECTIONAND LAYOUT

(3)

A

H

A

N

D

B

O

O

K

KATARUNGANG

PAMBARANGAY

(4)

Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook

Copyright © 2004 Philippines-Canada Local Government

Support Program (LGSP)

All rights reserved

The Philippines- Canada Local Government Support

Program (LGSP) encourages the use, translation, and

adaptation and copying of this material for non-commercial

use, with appropriate credit given to LGSP.

Although reasonable care has been taken in the

preparation of this handbook, neither the publisher and/or

contributor and/or writer can accept any liability for any

consequence arising from the use thereof or from any

information contained herein.

ISBN 971-92952-0-1

Printed and bound in Manila, Philippines

Published by:

Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal (SALIGAN)

1/F Hoffner Bldg., Social Development Complex

Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, 1108

Quezon City, Philippines

✆ (632) 4266001 local 4858 or 4860

Philippines-Canada Local Government Support

Program (LGSP)

Unit 1507 Jollibee Plaza

Emerald Avenue, 1600 Pasig City, Philippines

✆ (632) 637 3511-13

www.lgsp.org.ph

This project was undertaken with the financial support of

the Government of Canada provided through the Canadian

International Development Agency (CIDA).

(5)

IMPLEMENTED BY

A JOINT PROJECT OF

Agriteam Canada

www.agriteam.ca Federation of CanadianMunicipalities (FCM)

www.fcm.caDepartment of the Interior

and Local Government (DILG)

National Economic andDevelopment Authority (NEDA)

Canadian InternationalDevelopment AgencyProgramme de soutien aux

gouvernments locauxPHILIPPINES-CANADALOCAL GOVERNMENTSUPPORT PROGRAM

(6)(7)

Foreword

Acknowledgements

Preface

Definition of Terms

Introduction

PART

1

:

ACTUAL PROCESSES

Chapter 1 — Constitution of the Lupon

Chapter 2 — Mediation through

the Punong Barangay

Chapter 3 — Conciliation through

the Pangkat Tagapagkasundo

Chapter 4 — Arbitration

Chapter 5 — Indigenous Modes of Dispute

Resolution

PART

2

:

BENEFITS

,

INCENTIVES AND AWARDS

Chapter 1 — Scholarships

Chapter 2 — Incentives and Awards

Annexes — Katarungang Pambarangay Forms

KP Form # 1

KP Form # 2

KP Form # 3

KP Form # 4

KP Form # 5

KP Form # 6

KP Form # 7

KP Form # 8

KP Form # 9

KP Form # 10

KP Form # 11

KP Form # 12

KP Form #13

KP Form #14

CONTENTS

vii

ix

xi

xiii

1

9

20

33

52

58

69

73

Notice to Constitute the Lupon

Appointment Letter

Notice of Appointment

List of Appointed Lupon Members

Lupon Member Oath Statement

Withdrawal of Appointment

Complainant’s Form

Notice of Hearing

Summon for the Respondent

Notice for Constitution of Pangkat

Notice to Chosen Pangkat Member

Notice of Hearing (Conciliation

Proceedings)

Subpoena Letter

(8)

KP Form # 15

KP Form # 16

KP Form # 17

KP Form # 18

KP Form # 19

KP Form # 20

KP Form # 21

KP Form # 22

KP Form # 23

KP Form # 24

KP Form # 25

KP Form # 26

KP Form # 27

KP Form # 28

Arbitration Award

Amicable Settlement

Repudiation

Notice of Hearing for Complainant

Notice of Hearing for Respondent

Certification to File Action (from

Lupon Secretary)

Certification to File Action (from

Pangkat Secretary)

Certification to File Action

Certification to Bar Action

Certification to Bar Counterclaim

Motion for Execution

Notice of Hearing (Re: Motion for

Execution

Notice of Execution

(9)

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G AY

IT has always been a source of pride for us in the

Department of the Interior and Local Government to

bear witness to outstanding initiatives of partners in

local governance. We are therefore pleased to

acknowledge the latest publication of the

Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP),

Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook.

Republic Act 7160, otherwise known as the 1991

Local Government Code, gives barangays the

mandate to enforce peace and order and provide

support for the effective enforcement of human

rights and justice. Decentralization has facilitated the

recognition of the Katarungang Pambarangay or

Barangay Justice System as an alternative venue for

the resolution of disputes. The challenge facing local

governments now is to maximize and harness the

katarungang pambarangay as one of the most

valuable mechanisms available in administering

justice, advancing human rights protection and

resolving and/or mediating conflict at the barangay

level through non-adversarial means.

Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook

provides local governments an easy-to-use tool with

which to take up this challenge. It fills the need to

increase the awareness and understanding of

katarungang pambarangay and its value as an

empowering and alternative tool for the resolution of

community and family disputes at the barangay

level. With the fast-evolving demand for access to

justice, there is a need to utilize this mechanism

more strategically and proactively as a way to

promote peace at the grassroots. The Punong

Barangay (Barangay Heads), members of the Lupong

Tagapamayapa (Peace Council) and communities will

FOREWORD

(10)

A H A N D B O O K

benefit greatly from this publication. Moreover,

development workers, the academe and

non-governmental and people’s organizations will also

find this handbook useful in their work on barangay

justice.

This undertaking complements the efforts of the

DILG to popularize and mainstream governance

knowledge products through the Local Government

Academy and the agency’s regional learning centers.

The handbook provides a means for improved

access to dispute resolutions and will go a long way

towards enhancing knowledge on and strengthening

barangay governance and justice. The DILG,

therefore, congratulates the Philippines-Canada Local

Government Support Program for its commitment

and meaningful contributions to promoting

excellence in barangay governance as an integral

element of good, responsive and accountable local

governance.

HON. JOSE D. LINA JR.

Secretary

Department of the Interior and Local Government

(11)

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

THE support, collaboration and creative contributions

of the following individuals and institutions are

invaluable and were essential to the completion of

this publication:

The Philippines-Canada Local Government Support

Program led by Alix Yule and Marion Maceda

Villanueva for providing the necessary direction and

support

The Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal

(SALIGAN), especially Atty. Marlon J. Manuel, for their

partnership

Maricel Vigo for the overall writeup and excellent

technical contribution

LGSP Area Managers Tess Gajo, Merlinda Hussein,

Evelyn ji*z and LGSP Program Officers namely Vic

Alfaro, Edgar Catalan, Abduljim Hassan and Cris

Tagupa for their invaluable collaboration

LGSP Local Resource Partners Raissa Jajurie and

Raymond Salas of SALIGAN Mindanao, Pedrito Acosta

(Reg 12), Liza del Norte of Institute of Primary Health

Care (IPHC), Allan Carpio of Resource Center for

Empowerment and Development (RCED) for their

technical contribution

Divina Luz Lopez for her overall project management

and technical expertise in ensuring the quality of this

publication

Myn Garcia for providing technical and creative

direction, and overall supervision of the design,

layout and production

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

(12)

A H A N D B O O K

Arnold Beroya for the illustrations and Alecks Pabico

for layout and overall art direction

Raymond Oliveros, Janilo Rubiato and Tess

Tajanlangit for the translation of the handbook to

Tagalog, Cebuano and Ilonggo, respectively

Ria Adapon and Sef Carandang for overall

coordination and editorial work

Gigi Barazon and the rest of the LGSP administrative

staff for providing support.

(13)

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

KATARUNGANG Pambarangay: A Handbook is the

latest publication of the Philippines-Canada Local

Government Support Program (LGSP) as part of its

mandate to mainstream effective and responsive

barangay governance.

Republic Act 7160 or the Local Government Code

of 1991 expanded the scope and powers of the

Katarungang Pambarangay or the Barangay Justice

System designed not merely to decongest the courts

of cases but to address inequalities in access to

justice, particularly experienced by marginalized

communities. The barangays, being the basic

political unit in the country, is in the most strategic

position to facilitate resolution or mediation of

community and family disputes, alongside its

mandate to deliver basic services.

In empowering local government units in Western

Visayas and Mindanao, LGSP has designed initiatives

that strengthen barangay governance, including

enhancing and mainstreaming the use of and access

to the barangay justice system. The Katarungang

Pambarangay: A Handbook was designed to provide

a user-friendly, easy to read and simple tool to

promote the knowledge of the katarungang

pambarangay as an effective alternative mechanism

for dispute resolution.

This handbook aims to increase the

understanding of the Punong Barangays (barangay

heads) and members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa

(Barangay Peace Council) on the processes and

procedures of the barangay justice system to enable

them to maximize its use in their communities. It is

also intended to provide a practical overview for the

PREFACE

(14)

A H A N D B O O K

members of the communities — paralegals,

non-government and people’s organizations — regarding

the role and benefits of the katarungang

pambarangay in their lives.

By doing so, LGSP hopes that it would somehow

make a difference in people’s lives by contributing to

a better understanding and strategic administration

of the barangay justice system. Katarungang

Pambarangay: A Handbook is a modest contribution

to creating greater awareness of an alternative to

what can be an elitist and complex legal system,

often characterized by an arduous legal process. This

publication is a way to empower grassroots

communities to exact their basic rights and provide

them a viable way to do so.

The Philippines-Canada Local Government

Support Program

(15)

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

Adjudication is the power of courts or quasi-judicial

agencies to decide cases filed before them and

falling within their jurisdiction.

Amicable Settlement is an agreement reached

during mediation and conciliation proceedings.

Arbitration is a process wherein the third party

from outside the judicial system is chosen by parties

to hear and decide their dispute.

Arbitration Award is the decision reached by either

the lupon chairperson or pangkat, as the case may

be, upon prior agreement in writing by the parites to

a dispute for the adjudicators to resolve it.

Attachment is a provisional remedy in the form of

an order issued by a judge before whom the case is

pending by which the property is taken into legal

custody as security for satisfaction of a judgment

obtained by the prevailing party, either at the

commencement of the action or any time after the

filing of the case before the final judgment

Complainant — plaintiff

Complaint is a concise statement of ultimate facts

constituting the plaintiff’s cause and causes of

action.

Conciliation is a process wherein the Pangkat

forgoes the power to decide or recommend but assist

the parties to isolate issues and options to reach a

settlement by consensus that jointly satisfies their

needs

DEFINITION

OF

TERMS

(16)

A H A N D B O O K

Delivery of Personal Property (Replevin) is

provisional remedy by which a judge before whom

an action is pending for the recovery of personal

property issues an order for the delivery of such

property to the movant or the party filing the petition

upon filing of a bond to guarantee its return or to

answer for the damages.

Execution is the process of exacting satisfaction for

on or both of the parties through compulsory or

coercive means. It entails the enforcement of the

terms of the amicable settlement or arbitration award

in so far as this may enjoin or command any of the

parties to perform an act, give something or refrain

from doing some act

Habeas Corpus is a judicial proceeding for the

purpose of releasing a person who is illegally

deprived of liberty or restoring rightful custody to

the person who has been deprived of.

Incompetent means a person who is suffering the

penalty of civil interdiction; or who is a hospitalized

leper, prodigal, deaf and dumb who is unable to

communicate; one who is of unsound mind, even

though he has a lucid intervals and a person not

being unsound mind but by reason of age, disease,

weak mind, and other similar causes, cannot,

without outside aid, take care of himself and mange

his property, becoming thereby an easy prey for

deceit and exploitation.

Jurisdiction is an authority to hear and decide a

case and given by law and cannot be agreed by the

parties

Katarungang Barangay (KP) is a system of justice

administered at the barangay level for the purpose of

amicable settling disputes through mediation,

conciliation or abitration among the family or

barangay without resorting to the courts.

(17)

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

Lupong Tagapamayapa (Lupon) is a body

organized in every barangay composed of Punong

Barangay as the chairperson and not less than ten

(10) and more than twenty from which the members

of every Pangkat shall be chosen.

Mediation is a process wherein the Lupon

chairperson or Barangay Chairperson assists the

disputing parties to reach a settlement by consensus

that jointly satisfies their needs.

Minor is a person below eighteen (18) years of age.

Next of Kin is an individual who is a relative or a

responsible friend with whom the minor or

incompetent lives

Pangkat Tagapagkasundo (Pangkat) is a

conciliation panel constituted from the Lupon

membership for every dispute brought before the

Lupon consisting of three (3) members after the

Punong Barangay has failed in his mediation efforts.

Preliminary injunction is a provisional remedy in

the form of an order issued by a judge before whom

the case is pending at any stage before the final

judgment requiring a person to refrain from a

particular act.

Repudiation is an act of rejecting the validity or

refusing to accept the terms and conditions of

agreement on the ground of vitiation of consent by

fraud, violence or intimidation.

Respondent — defendant

Statute of Limitations is the law which bars or

does not allow the institution or filing of an action or

case against another after the expiration of the

period prescribe d for such action or offense

Support Pendente Lite is a provisional remedy in a

(18)

A H A N D B O O K

form of an order issued by a judge before whom the

case is pending granting allowance, dwelling,

clothing, education and medical attendance to the

person entitled thereof.

Venue is the place where the case is to be heard and

decided. This is not fixed by law except in criminal

cases, and can be agreed upon by the parties.

(19)

INTRODUCTION

THE Katarungang Pambarangay or Barangay Justice

System is a community-based dispute settlement

mechanism that is administered by the basic political

unit of the country, the barangay. As a

community-based mechanism for dispute resolution, it covers

disputes between members of the same community

(generally, same city/municipality) and involves the

Punong Barangay and other members of the

communities (the Lupon members) as intermediaries

(mediators, conciliators, and, sometimes,

arbitrators).

The establishment and operation of the Barangay

Justice System is mandated by Republic Act No. 7160

or the Local Government Code of 1991. Prior to this

law, however, the establishment of the Barangay

Justice System had been covered by Presidential

Decree 1508 in 1978 and Batas Pambansa Blg. 337

or the 1983 Local Government Code.

When PD 1508 first decreed the setting up of the

Barangay Justice System, the law had the following

objectives:

X

To promote the speedy administration of

justice

X

To minimize the indiscriminate filing of cases

in courts

X

To minimize the congestion of court dockets

and thereby enhance the quality of justice

dispensed by the courts

X

To perpetuate and recognize the time-honored

tradition of amicably settling disputes at the

community level

(20)

2

A H A N D B O O K

These same objectives are stated in the

Katarungang Pambarangay Rules that were

promulgated by the Department of Justice on June 1,

1992, pursuant to the mandate of the Local

Government Code. These rules serve as the

implementing rules for the provisions of the Local

Government Code on the establishment,

administration, and operation of the Barangay Justice

System.

Under the Barangay Justice System, the main

strategy for settling disputes is to provide a venue

for the disputing parties to search for a solution that

is mutually acceptable. Hence, the primary role of

the system is not to decide disputes and impose a

solution on the parties but to assist the parties in

discussing the possible amicable settlement of their

disputes. The Punong Barangay and the community

conciliators (Lupon members) do not act as judges or

adjudicators of disputes but as facilitators for the

disputing parties’ discussion of possible solutions.

For this reason, the personal appearance and

participation of the disputing parties is necessary,

while the non-appearance of the parties will have

corresponding sanctions. Also because of the need

for the disputing parties’ personal participation in the

conciliation proceedings, disputes involving

non-natural persons like

corporations are not

subject to the

conciliation

proceedings of the

Barangay Justice

System.

The Barangay

Justice System

provides an

alternative mode for

dispute resolution to

the costly and lengthy

process of settling

Simply put, the

Barangay Justice

System provides a

friendly, inexpensive,

and speedy forum for

the settlement of

disputes where the

parties can freely

explore options for

amicably resolving

their disputes without

resorting to the

(21)

3

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G AY

disputes in regular courts. Instead of going through

the very technical procedure of filing formal

pleadings and presenting evidence in courts, the

parties of a dispute are given the opportunity to try

to talk to each other and resolve their disputes

amicably. The technical processes and rules that are

usually applied in court proceedings are not applied.

Filing a case in court, or defending oneself against

such a case,

would necessarily

entail the services

of lawyers. In the

Barangay Justice

System, however,

the parties do not

need to secure the

services of

lawyers. In fact,

the law prohibits

the participation

of lawyers in the

conciliation proceedings. While cases that are tried

in courts generally take years to be resolved, cases

that go through the Barangay Justice System would

generally take only a few weeks.

Simply put, the Barangay Justice System provides

a friendly, inexpensive, and speedy forum for the

settlement of disputes where the parties can freely

explore options for amicably resolving their disputes

without resorting to the courts.

On the issue of access to justice, the Barangay

Justice System provides an accessible mechanism for

resolving the justice issues of the poor.

In some areas where the courts are inaccessible,

both because of location and because of the

prohibitive costs of litigation, the Barangay Justice

System, with all its limitations, can be the only venue

that the poor can avail of for the resolution of their

disputes.

In some areas where the

courts are inaccessible, both

because of location and

because of the prohibitive

costs of litigation, the

Barangay Justice System,

with all its limitations, can

be the only venue that the

poor can avail of for the

resolution of their disputes.

(22)

4

A H A N D B O O K

The Barangay Justice System is also envisioned to

complement the courts in administering justice. For

cases that are covered by the Barangay Justice

System, it is compulsory for the parties to go

through the Barangay Justice System proceedings

first before going to court. Failure to do so would

mean the dismissal of the parties’ claim or

counterclaim. It is only when the Barangay Justice

System has failed to resolve the dispute that the

parties will be allowed to bring their case to court.

The Supreme Court issued Administrative

Circular No. 14-93 on July 15, 1993 directing the

courts to ensure compliance with the requirement of

prior recourse to the Barangay Justice as a condition

for filing a complaint in court for cases that are

covered by the system.

With more disputing parties settling their

disputes at the community level, it is expected that

the filing of cases between members of the same

community will be minimized. This, in turn, will help

reduce the congestion of the courts’ dockets and,

hopefully, improve the efficiency and quality of the

courts’ dispensation of justice. The Barangay Justice

system is, thus, both an alternative and

complementary mode of resolution to the court

system.

The Barangay Justice System maximizes the use

of time-honored traditions and practices of

communities in settling disputes between

community members. Filipinos traditionally resort to

the help of older members of the family, community

elders, or tribe leaders in resolving disputes between

members of the same family or community. This is

the common practice that is recognized and

formalized by the Barangay Justice System. In lieu of

family members, community elders, or tribe leaders,

the Barangay Justice System uses the Punong

Barangay and the Lupon Members, who are

appointed from the respected members of the

(23)

5

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G AY

community. In recognition of traditional customary

practices in some indigenous communities, the law

on the Barangay Justice System provides that in

communities that have distinct traditional practices

of settling disputes, the customs and traditions of

the indigenous cultural communities shall be

applied. Thus, local systems of settling disputes

through their councils of datus or elders are

recognized and followed with the same force and

effect as the procedure laid down in the law.

The strength of the Barangay Justice System lies

in the fact that it is based in the community itself,

and is administered by community members using

traditional practices in dispute resolution. With this

set-up, the disputing parties are expected to be more

comfortable in discussing their problems and in

exploring solutions to the disputes. It is likewise

expected that the community-based set-up of the

Barangay Justice System will ensure that the parties

will honor the amicable settlement that was agreed

upon. Ultimately, the Barangay Justice System is

envisioned to live up to its name. It is expected to

ensure the dispensation of justice at the grassroots

level.

The first part of the handbook discusses the

actual processes of the Katarungang Pambarangay

(KP). The second part deals with the benefits,

incentives and awards of the system. The Annexes

contains samples of al the KP forms that are used in

the process, for reference.

The Supreme Court issued Administrative

Circular No. 14-93 on July 15, 1993 directing the

courts to ensure compliance with the

requirement of prior recourse to the Barangay

Justice as a condition for filing a complaint in

court for cases that are covered by the system.

(24)

6

A H A N D B O O K

This handbook has also been translated to three

Philippine dialects, namely Tagalog, Cebuano and

Ilonggo, to facilitate greater use and understanding

of the system at the community level. Also, a

handbook on the Barangay Justice System in ARMM is

being developed, which takes a look at the existing

indigenous/traditional mechanisms of dispensing

justice in the Muslim and Moro cultures.

(25)

P

A

R

T

O

N

E

ACTUAL

PRACTICES

(26)(27)

THANK YOU

.

ACTUALLY

,

ICAMETO ASKSOMEQUESTIONSREGARDING THE ADMINISTRA

-TION OF THEBARANGAYJUSTICESYSTEM INOURBARANGAY

.

WELL

,

YOU HAVECOMETOTHE RIGHT

PERSON

,

SITDOWN AND

HAVE

SOME

COFFEE

.

YOU KNOWCELIA

,

BARANGAY JUSTICE OR

KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAYISONE

IMPORTANT SYSTEMIN OURBARANGAY TORESOLVE DISPUTESFAIRLYAND SPEEDILY

.

THISISA SALIENT PART OFTHEBARANGAY

SFUNCTION TOPROMOTEPEACE AND HARMONIOUS RELATIONSHIPSAMONG COMMUNITYMEMBERS

.

THIS ISALSOIN RECOGNITIONOFTHECAPACITYOFTHE BARANGAYAND ITS LEADERSTOFACILITATE THESETTLEMENT AND

RESOLUTION OFDISPUTESAT THEIRLEVEL

.

HELLO

.

GOOD MORNING

,

TOO

.

CONGRATULATIONSTOTHENEWPUNONGBARANGAYOFBAGONGDIWA

.

WHATCAN IDOFORYOU

?

GOODMORNING

,

KAPITAN PEDRING

.

CONSTITUTION

OF

THE

LUPON

C H A P T E R O N E

ONEMORNINGINBARANGAYPAG

-

ASA

...

(28)

10

A H A N D B O O K

HE

/

SHE CANBE CHARGEDOFNEGLECT OFDUTYAND BESUBJECTED TOADMINISTRATIVESANCTIONS

.

WHATIFTHEPUNONG

BARANGAYFAILS TOORGANIZE THELUPON

?

REALLY

?

WHENAND HOWCANI CONSTITUTETHELUPON

?

WITHINFIFTEEN

(

15

)

DAYSFROM THE STARTOFOUR TERM ASPUNONGBARANGAY

,

WESHOULDISSUE A NOTICETOCONSTITUTE THELUPONAND PREPARETHELISTOF THENAMES OFPROPOSEDLUPONMEMBERS

.

AMINIMUM OF TENAND AMAXIMUMOFTWENTY PERSONS

.

HOW MANY PEOPLE

SHOULD IINCLUDEIN THE LIST

?

I SEE

.

BUTISIT ONLYTHE PUNONGBARANGAY WHOHASTHE AUTHORITY TOCONSTITUTE THE LUPON

?

YES

,

THEPUNONG BARANGAYCANAPPOINT THELUPON MEMBERS

.

IT

IS HIS

/

HEREXCLUSIVE

PREROGATIVE

NO NEEDFORAPPROVAL

,

CONFIRMATION ORRATIFICATIONOFTHE

(29)

11

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

WHO AREQUALIFIED TOBEMEMBERS OFTHELUPON

?

ANYBODY WHOISAN ACTUAL RESIDENTORWORKING INTHE BARANGAY

,

OFLEGAL AGEAND POSSESSESTHE FOLLOWING

QUALITIES

:

INTEGRITY

,

IMPARTIALITY

,

INDEPENDENCE

,

FAIRNESS

,

REPUTATIONFORPROBITY

,

PATIENCE

,

RESOURCEFULNESS

,

OPEN

-

MINDEDNESS ANDFLEXIBILITY

,

CAN BEA MEMBEROF THELUPON

.

QUALIFIED AS LUPONMEMBERS ACTUALRESIDENTS

/

WORKINGIN THE

BARANGAY OFLEGAL AGE

WITH THEFOLLOWING

QUALITIES

:

INTEGRITY

,

IMPARTIALITY

,

INDEPENDENCE

,

FAIRNESS

,

REPUTATION FOR

PROBITY

,

PATIENCE

,

RESOURCEFULNESS

,

OPEN

-

MINDEDNESS FLEXIBILITYDISQUALIFIED TO BELUPON MEMBERS

BELOW

18

YRSOfa*gE INCOMPETENT CONVICTEDOFA CRIMECARRYING WITHITPENALTIES OF PERPETUALORTEMPORARYDISQUALIFICATIONFROMHOLDING PUBLIC OFFICE ELECTED GOVERNMENT

OFFICIAL

MEMBER OFARMEDFORCES WHOIS IN THEACTIVE SERVICE

(30)

12

A H A N D B O O K

THISNOTICE SHALLBE POSTEDIN THREECONSPICUOUS ORSTRATEGIC PLACES

WITHIN THEBARANGAY

.

THE NOTICESHALLCONTAIN ANINVITATION TOALL

BARANGAYMEMBERS TO ENDORSEOROPPOSE THEPROPOSED

APPOINTMENT OFANY PERSON

/

SINCLUDEDIN THE LIST

.

THERECOMMENDATION SHALLBE MADE WITHINTHE PERIODOF POSTINGFOR THREEWEEKS

.

YOUR SECRETARY

,

WHOISALSO THE CONCURRENTSECRETARY OFLUPON

,

SHALLPREPARE ANOTICETO CONSTITUTETHELUPON USINGKP FORM 1.

AFTERIDENTIFYING THE

10

-

20 MEMBERS OFMYLUPON

,

WHATARE THENEXTSTEPS

?

AFTER THAT

,

WHERE SHALLWEPUT THENOTICE

?

(31)

13

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY

______ , 20__

NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE THE LUPON

To All Barangay Members and All Other Persons Concerned:In compliance with Section 1(a), Chapter 7, Title One, Book III, LocalGovernment Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160), of the KatarungangPambarangay Law, notice is hereby given to constitute the LupongTagapamayapa of this Barangay. The persons I am considering forappointment are the following:

1. __________________ 13. _________________2. __________________ 14. _________________3. __________________ 15. _________________4. __________________ 16. _________________5. __________________ 17. _________________6. __________________ 18. _________________7. __________________ 19. _________________8. __________________ 20. _________________9. __________________ 21. _________________10. _________________ 22. _________________11. _________________ 23. _________________12. _________________ 24. _________________25. _________________

They have been chosen on the basis of their suitability for the task ofconciliation considering their integrity, impartiality, independence of mind,sense of fairness and reputation for probity in view of their age, socialstanding in the community, tact, patience, resourcefulness, flexibility, openmindedness and other relevant factors. The law provides that only thoseactually residing or working in the barangay who are not expresslydisqualified by law are qualified to be appointed as Lupon members.All persons are hereby enjoined to immediately inform me and of theiropposition to or endorsem*nt of any or all the proposed members orrecommend to me other persons not included in the list but not later than the________ day of _______, 20__ (the last day for posting this notice).

_________________Punong Barangay

IMPORTANT: This notice is required to be posted in three (3) conspicuousplaces in the barangay for at least three (3) weeks

WARNING: Tearing or defacing this notice shall be subject to punishmentaccording to law.

(32)

14

A H A N D B O O K

YES

,

KAPITANA

.

ANDTEN DAYS AFTER THELAST DAY OFPOSTING

,

YOU

SHALLPUT INWRITINGYOURAPPOINTMENT OFYOUR LUPON MEMBERS

USINGKP FORM 2

,

DULY SIGNED BY THEPUNONGBARANGAY AND ATTESTED BY THEBARANGAY SECRETARY

.

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY

______ , 20__ (Date)

APPOINTMENT

TO: ___________

Pursuant to Chapter 7, Title One, Book III, Local Government Code of 1991(Republic Act No. 7160), you are hereby appointed MEMBER of theLupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay effective upon taking your oath ofoffice and until a new Lupon is constituted on the third year following yourappointment. _________________Punong BarangayATTESTED:________________Barangay Secretary

KP FORM # 2: APPOINTMENT LETTER

YOU MEAN

,

ANY MEMBEROFMYBARANGAY CANPROTEST ORRECOMMEND SOMEBODYFROM THEBARANGAY

?

THE NEWLYAPPOINTED LUPONMEMBERS SHALL TAKE THEIROATHIMMEDIATELYBEFORE YOU ASPUNONGBARANGAY USINGKP

(33)

STEP 1: Determining the actual number

of Lupon Members

STEP 2: Preparing a notice to constitute the Lupon

STEP 3: Posting the notice to constitute the Lupon

STEP 4: Appointment of Lupon Members

STEP 5: Oath taking of Lupon members

STEP 6: Posting

SIX STEPS TO CONSTITUTETHE LUPON

AFTER THEIROATH TOOFFICE

,

WHATWILLIDO NEXT

?

THELIST OFAPPOINTEDLUPON MEMBERS SHALLBEPOSTED INTHREESTRATEGICAND HIGHLYVISIBLE PLACESINTHEBARANGAY

.

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY

OATH OF OFFICE

Pursuant to Chapter 7, Title One, Book II, Local Government Code of 1991(Republic Act No. 7160), I _______________, being duly qualified andhaving been duly appointed MEMBER of the Lupong Tagapamayapa of thisBarangay, do hereby solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully andconscientiously discharge to the best of my ability, my duties and functions assuch member and as member of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo in which Imay be chosen to serve; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to theRepublic of the Philippines; that I will support and defend its Constitution andobey the laws, legal orders and decrees promulgated by its duly constitutedauthorities; and that I voluntarily impose upon myself this obligation withoutany mental reservation or purpose of evasion.

SO HELP ME GOD. (In case of affirmation the last sentence will be omitted.)_____________

Member

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to (or AFFIRMED) before me this _____ dayof __________, 20____.

__________________Punong Barangay

(34)

16

A H A N D B O O K

WHATISTHETERM OFOFFICEOFEACH LUPONMEMBER

?

ARETHE LUPONMEMBERSENTITLEDTOSOMECOMPENSATION

?

DOTHEY HAVEBENEFITS DUETOTHEM

?

UPON APPOINTMENT

,

EACHLUPON MEMBER SHALLSERVEFOR THREE

(

3

)

YEARSUNLESSTERMINATED BY DEATH

,

RESIGNATION

,

TRANSFEROFRESIDENCE ORPLACE OFWORK

,

OR WITHDRAWALOF

APPOINTMENT BY THE PUNONGBARANGAY

.

HOWEVER

,

THEWITHDRAWAL SHOULDBECONCURRED WITH A MAJORITYOF ALLTHE MEMBERS OFLUPON

. (

SEE KP FORM 6

)

THE LUPON MEMBERS SHALLSERVE WITHOUTANYCOMPENSATION

.

IFTHEBARANGAY HASENOUGHFUNDS

,

WECANALWAYS GIVEHONORARIA TOLUPON

MEMBERS WHOHAVEPARTICIPATED INTHE

RESOLUTION OFA PARTICULARCASE

.

ON THE OTHERHAND

,

UNDER COMMISSION ONHIGHER EDUCATION

(

CHED

)

ORDER 62SERIESOF 1997

,

TWO DAUGHTERSOR SONS OFA LUPONMEMBER ARE

QUALIFIED TOBECOME ASTATE SCHOLAR INTERTIARYEDUCATION TOANY STATECOLLEGES OR UNIVERSITIES

.

(35)

17

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA

______ , 20__ (Date)

WITHDRAWAL OF APPOINTMENT

TO: _______________

After due hearing and with the concurrence of a majority of all the LupongTagapamayapa members of this Barangay, your appointment as memberthereof is hereby withdrawn effective upon receipt hereof, on the followingground/s:

[ ] incapacity to discharge the duties of your office as shown by_______________________________

[ ] unsuitability by reason of _______________________________(Check whichever is applicable and detail or specify the act/s oromission/s constituting the ground/s for withdrawal.)

____________________________Punong Barangay/Lupon ChairmanCONFORME (Signatures):1. __________________ 7. _________________2. __________________ 8. _________________3. __________________ 9. _________________4. __________________ 10. _________________5. __________________ 11. _________________6. __________________

Received this __________ day of _____________, 19____.__________________

SignatureNOTE:

The members of the Lupon conforming to the withdrawal must personallyaffix their signatures or thumb marks on the pertinent spaces above. Thewithdrawal must be conformed to by more than one-half of the total numberof members of the Lupon including the Punong Barangay and the memberconcerned.

(36)

18

A H A N D B O O KGOODTOHEAR

!…

ATLEASTTHEIRCOMMIT

-MENTAND SERVICESAREMORE OR LESS COMPEN

-SATED

.

WHERE CAN WESOURCE OTHER FUNDSFORTHELUPONOPERATIONSASIDEFROMBARANGAYFUNDS

?

WE CANALWAYS ASKTHE MUNICIPAL

GOVERNMENT FORSOMEALLOCATION REGARDINGTHE OPERATIONSOFLUPONAND INCLUDEIT INITS

ANNUALBUDGET

.

BACK TOMY ROLEASACHAIRPERSONOFLUPON

,

ARETHEREANY SPECIFIC

FUNCTIONSRELATED TOADMINISTERINGBARANGAYJUSTICE

?

HOWCAN IINVOLVEMYSANGGUNIANG

BARANGAYINBARANGAY JUSTICEADMINISTRATION

?

INDEED

,

YOUR ROLEASCHAIRPERSONOF LUPONISVERY CRUCIAL

.

HOWEVER

,

WECAN DISCUSSIT AS WEGOALONG WITH THEDIFFERENTWAYSOFRESOLVING

DISPUTESORCONFLICTS INYOUR BARANGAY

WELL

,

THE SANGGUNIANGBARANGAYHASTHE DUTY TO

PROVIDETHE ADMINIS

-TRATIVENEEDS OFTHE

LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPAAND THE PANGKAT

TAGAPAGKASUNDO BYALLOCATING FUNDSFROM THEINTERNALREVENUE ALLOTMENTFORTHE KATARUNGANGPAMBARANGAY

.

(37)

19

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

OK

,

NOW PLEASE TELL MEWHAT ISTHEFIRST STEPOF RESOLVING

CONFLICT ORDISPUTE INMY

BARANGAY

?

HAVEYOUR COFFEE

,

FIRSTAND YOURMANANGSOLING ISPREPARINGBOILED SWEETPOTATOESAND SABA

(38)

MEDIATION

THROUGH

THE

PUNONG

BARANGAY

C H A P T E R T W O

WHAT IFONLY ONEOF THEINVOLVEDPARTIESARE FROMMY BARANGAY

?

INTHIS CASE

,

THE DISPUTEWILLBE SETTLEDIN THEBARANGAY WHERE THE

RESPONDENTS ORONE OFTHERESPONDENTS RESIDE AT THECHOICEOFTHE COMPLAINANT

.

ISTHATCLEARTO YOU

?

ASPUNONGBARANGAY

,

YOU HAVEAN

AUTHORITY ORPOWERTOMEDIATECASES OFTHERESIDENTS INYOUR BARANGAY

.

YES

,

KAPITAN

.

WHATWOULDIDOIFTHEREWILLBECASES PRESENTEDTOMEIN THEBARANGAY

?

HOWCANIHELP INRESOLVINGIT

?

THIS SABAISSO SWEET

.

REALLY

?

THANKSFOR THECOMPLI

-MENTS

!

WHATIS YOURQUESTIONAGAIN

?

(39)

21

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G AY

WELL

,

HE

/

SHE SHOULDBE

REPRESENTED BYA LEGAL GUARDIANORNEXTOF KINWHOISNOTALAWYER

.

CANIMEDIATECASESINVOLVINGCOOPERATIVESORPEOPLE

SORGANIZATIONOPERATINGINMYBARANGAY

?

NO

,

IDON

TTHINKSO

.

AJURIDICAL PERSONORCORPORATION

LIKEA COOPERATIVECANNOTFILEA COMPLAINTBECAUSEIT ISNOTA PARTYTOAMICABLE

SETTLEMENT

.

ANY CASEINVOLVINGCOOPERATIVEORPEOPLE

SORGANIZATION CANGODIRECTLY TOCOURT WITHOUTGOING THROUGHMEDIATIONORCONCILIATION

.

SOWHAT ARETHE CASESUNDER THE KATARUNGANGPAMBARANGAY

?

ALL DISPUTES

,

CIVILANDCRIMINALIN NATUREWHEREPARTIESACTUALLY RESIDE INTHE SAMECITY OR

MUNICIPALITY ARE

SUBJECTED TO PROCEEDINGSOFAMICABLE SETTLEMENT

.

THERE ARECASES THATFALLUNDER OUR JURISDICTION

.

YES

,

NOW

,

WHATIFANY OFTHE INVOLVEDPARTIESISINCOMPETENT ORA MINOR

?

(40)

22

A H A N D B O O K

CASES UNDER KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAYUNLAWFUL USEOF MEANSOFPUBLICATIONANDUNLAWFUL

UTTERANCES

(

ART

.

154

);

ALARMSANDSCANDALS

(

ART

.

155

);

USINGFALSECERTIFICATES

(

ART

.

175

);

USING FICTITIOUSNAMESANDCONCEALINGTRUENAMES

(

ART

.

178

);

ILLEGALUSEOF UNIFORMSANDINSIGNIAS

(

ART

.

179

);

PHYSICALINJURIES INFLICTEDINA TUMULTUOUSAFFRAY

(

ART

.

252

);

GIVINGASSISTANCETOCONSUMMATEDSUICIDE

(

ART

.

253

);

RESPONSIBILITYOF PARTICIPANTSINADUEL IFONLYPHYSICALINJURIES AREINFLICTEDOR NOPHYSICALINJURIESHAVEBEENINFLICTED

(

ART

.

260

);

LESSSERIOUSPHYSICALINJURIES

(

ART

.

265

);

SLIGHTPHYSICALINJURIES ANDMALTREATMENT

(

ART

.

266

);

UNLAWFULARREST

(

ART

.

269

);

INDUCINGAMINOR TOABANDONHIS

/

HERHOME

(

ART

.

271

);

ABANDONMENT OFAPERSONINDANGERANDABANDONMENTOFONE

S OWNVICTIM

(

ART

.

275

);

ABANDONING AMINOR

(

ACHILDUNDERSEVEN[7] YEARSOLD

) (

ART

.

276

);

ABANDONMENT OFAMINOR BYPERONSENTRUSTEDWITHHIS

/

HERCUSTODY

;

INDIFFERENCEOFPARENTS

(

ART

.

277

);

QUALIFIEDTRESSPASS TODWELLING

(

WITHOUT THEUSEOFVIOLENCEANDINTIMIDATION

). (

ART

.

280

);

OTHERFORMSOFTRESSPASS

(

ART

.

281

);

LIGHTTHREATS

(

ART

.

283

);

OTHERLIGHT THREATS

(

ART

.

285

);

GRAVECOERCION

(

ART

.

286

);

LIGHTCOERCION

(

ART

.

287

);

OTHER SIMILARCOERCIONS

(

COMPULSORY PURCHASEOFMERCHANDISEANDPAYMENTOF WAGESBYMEANSOFTOKENS

). (

ART

.

288

);

23.FORMATION

,

MAINTENANCEAND PROHIBITIONOFCOMBINATION OFCAPITALOR LABORTHROUGHVIOLENCEORTHREATS

(

ART

.

289

);

(41)

23

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

DISCOVERING SECRETSTHROUGHSEIZURE ANDCORRESPONDENCE

(

ART

.

290

);

REVEALINGSECRETSWITHABUSEOF AUTHORITY

(

ART

.

291

);

THEFT

(

IFTHE VALUEOF THEPROPERTYSTOLEN DOESNOTEXCEEDP50.00

). (

ART

.

309

);

QUALIFIEDTHEFT

(

IFTHEAMOUNT DOESNOTEXCEEDP500

). (

ART

.

310

);

OCCUPATIONOF REALPROPERTYOR USURPATIONOF REALRIGHTSINPROPERTY

(

ART 312

);

ALTERINGBOUNDARIESOR LANDMARKS

(

ART

.

313

);

SWINDLINGOR ESTAFA

(

IFTHE AMOUNTDOESNOTEXCEEDP200.00

). (

ART

.

315

);

OTHERFORMSOFSWINDLING

(

ART

.

316

);

SWINDLINGAMINOR

(

ART

.

317

);

OTHERDECEITS

(

ART

.

318

);

REMOVAL

,

SALE OR PLEDGEOFMORTGAGEDPROPERTY

(

ART

.

319

);

SPECIAL CASESOF MALICIOUSMISCHIEF

(

IFTHEVALUEOFTHEDAMAGEDPROPERTYDOESNOT EXCEEDP1,000.00

).

(

ART 328

);

OTHER MISCHIEFS

(

IFTHEVALUE OFTHEDAMAGEDPROPERTYDOESNOTEXCEED P1,000.00

). (

ART

.

329

);

SIMPLESEDUCTION

(

ART

.

338

);

ACTSOF LASCIVIOUSNESSWITHTHECONSENT OFTHEOFFENDEDPARTY

(

ART 339

);

THREATENING TOPUBLISH ANDOFFERTO PREVENTSUCHPUBLICATIONFORCOMPENSATION

(

ART

.

356

);

PROHIBITINGPUBLICATION OF ACTSREFERRED TOINTHECOURSEOFOFFICIALPROCEEDINGS

(

ART

.

357

);

INCRIMINATINGINNOCENTPERSONS

(

ART

.

363

);

INTRIGUINGAGAINSTHONOR

(

ART

.

364

);

ISSUINGCHECKS WITHOUT SUFFICIENTFUNDS

(

BP22

);

FENCING OFSTOLEN PROPERTIES IFTHE PROPERTYINVOLVEDISNOTMORETHAN P50.00

(

PD1612

).

(42)

24

A H A N D B O O K

MY

GOODNESS

!

THAT

SA LOT

!

WHATOTHERCASES ARE EXEMPTEDIN KATARUNGANGPAMBARANGAY ASIDEFROMTHATOF AJURIDICAL PERSON ORCORPORATION

?

OFFENSESINVOLVINGGOVERNMENT ENTITY

;

OFFENSESWITH MAXIMUM

PENALTYOF1 YEARAND EXCEEDING FINE FIVETHOUSAND

(

P5,000.00

);

OFFENSESWITH NO PRIVATEPARTY

;

REAL PROPERTIESINDIFFERENTCITIES ORMUNICIPALITIES

,

DISPUTESTHAT NEEDURGENTLEGAL ACTION

,

LABOR DISPUTES

,

LAND DISPUTESAND ACTION TOANNULA JUDGMENTUPON ACOMPROMISE

.

WHATWILL BETHE FIRSTSTEPIN MEDIATINGCASES

?

OK

.

THE COMPLAINANT

,

WITH THE HELPOF YOURSECRETARY

,

WILLFILL UPKP FORM 7

.

A MINIMALFILING FEE ISBEING CHARGED

AND

PAID TOTHEBARANGAY TREASURER

.

IT ISALSO VERYIMPORTANT TO

NOTETHAT NO INDIVIDUAL CAN

GO DIRECTLYTOCOURT OR ANYGOVERNMENT OFFICEFORADJUDICATION OF HIS

/

HERDISPUTE WITH ANOTHERINDIVIDUAL ESPECIALLYIFTHEMATTER ISWITHIN YOURJURISDICTION

.

(43)

25

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA

___________________ Barangay Case No. ___________________________________ For: ____________________________ Complainant/s________________________________________________________________ — against —____________________________________ Respondent/sC O M P L A I N T

I/WE hereby complain against above named respondent/s for violating my/ourrights and interests in the following manner:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

THEREFORE, I/WE pray that the following relief/s be granted to me/us inaccordance with law and/or equity:

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Made this _______ day of ___________, 19____.________________

Complainant/s

Received and filed this ________ day of __________, 19____.____________________________

Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman

(44)

26

A H A N D B O O K

YOU MEAN

,

THE CONCERNEDPARTIESMUST GOTHROUGHTHE KATARUNGANG

PAMBARANGAY

?

ISEE

ARE WENOTACTINGLIKEA COURT ANDTHELUPON ASJUDGES

?

OK

,

NOW AFTER THE

COMPLAINANT HASPAIDTHEFILING FEE

,

WHATIS THENEXTSTEP

?

YES

,

EXCEPTWHEN THEPARTIES

PERSONALLYCONFRONTED EACH OTHERAND SETTLETHEIR DISPUTE

.

BUTIFNOT

,

THEY SHOULDGOTHROUGHTHE

CONCILIATORY PROCEEDINGSORELSETHE COURTS

CANSIMPLY DISMISS FOR LACK

OF CAUSE OF ACTION OR

PREMATURITY

.

NO

,

WE ARENOT

.

THEBASICDISTINCTION IN OURWORKAS LUPONISTHAT IT ISNOT ABARANGAY COURT ANDLUPONMEMBERS ARE NOTJUDGES

.

IT IS A

CONCILIATIONBODYANDTHE MEMBERS ARECONCILIATORS

.

INYOURCASE

,

YOU ARE THEMEDIATOR

.

WITHINTHREE

(

3

)

DAYS

,

YOU SHOULDISSUE ANOTICEOFHEARING TOTHECOMPLAINANTAND SUMMONTHERESPONDENT BOTHOFWHOMSHOULDAPPEAR INYOUR OFFICE

.

(45)

27

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

WHATIFANYOFTHE PARTIESFAILEDTOAPPEAR

?

IFTHECOMPLAINANT CANNOT APPEAR BEFOREYOU

WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLECAUSE

,

HIS

/

HER

COMPLAINTWILL BEDISMISSED ANDEVENTUALLYHE

/

SHE CANNOT FILE ACASE INCOURT

.

HE CAN

ALSO BEPUNISHED

/

REPRIMANDEDFORINDIRECTCONTEMPT

.

HOWEVER

,

IF

THE RESPONDENT CANNOT ALSO APPEAR WITHOUT

JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE

,

HIS

/

HERCOUNTERCLAIM IF

THEREISANY

,

WILL BEDISMISSED AND HE WILLBEBARREDFROMFILING INCOURT AND BEPUNISHEDFORINDIRECTCONTEMPT OFCOURT

.

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA

NOTICE OF HEARING(MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS)

TO: _________________ ________________Complainant/s

You are hereby required to appear before me on the ______ day of _______,19___ at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for the hearing of yourcomplaint.

This ________ day of ____________, 19____.____________________________

Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman

Notified this ________ day of __________, 19____.complainant/s

______________________________

(46)

28

A H A N D B O O K

THEIR CASE BUT YOU WILL HELP THEM RESOLVE

THEIR CASE

.

AS MEDIATOR

,

YOU WILLLISTEN

TOTHEM CAREFULLY AND HELPTHEM FINDTHE

WHATIFBOTHOFTHEM APPEAR

?

HOWWILL IRESOLVETHEIR CASES

?

CORRECTION

,

YOU WILL NOT RESOLVE

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA___________________ Barangay Case No. ___________________________________ For: ____________________________ Complainant/s________________________________________________________________ — against —____________________________________ Respondent/sS U M M O N STO: ____________________ _____________________________________________ _________________________Respondents

You are hereby summoned to appear before me in person, together with yourwitnesses, on the _______ day of _________, 19___ at ____________o’clock in the morning/afternoon, then and there to answer to a complaintmade before me, copy of which is attached hereto, for mediation/conciliationof your dispute with complainant/s.

You are hereby warned that if you refuse or willfully fail to appear inobedience to this summons, you may be barred from filing any counterclaimarising from said complaint.

FAIL NOT or else face punishment as for contempt of court.This _______ day of ____________, 19___.

_____________________________Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman

(47)

29

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

SOLUTIONWITHIN 15 DAYS

.

IFTHE RESPONDENTDOESNOTAPPEAR

,

THECASE WILL BEREFERRED TOTHEPANGKATTAPAGPAGKASUNDO

.

NOW

,

BEFORE IASKFURTHER ONTHE PANGKAT

,

ASTHE PUNONGBARANGAY

,

WHATWILL IDO INHANDLINGTHEIR CASES PROPERLY

?

BEFORE THE ACTUALMEDIATION

,

ITIS NECESSARYFORYOU TOKNOWTHE

PARTIES INVOLVEDAND THEIRDIFFERENCES

.

OFFICER’S RETURN

I served this summons upon respondent ____________________________ onthe ______ day of ______________, 19____, and upon respondent

___________________________ on the day of ________________, 19____,by:

(Write name/s of respondent/s before mode by which he/they was/wereserved.)

Respondent/s

__________________________ 1. handing to him/them saidsummons in person, or__________________________ 2. handing to him/them said

summons and he/they refused toreceive it, or

__________________________ 3. leaving said summons at his/theirdwelling with __________ (name)a person of suitable age anddiscretion residing therein, or__________________________ 4. leaving said summons at his/their

office/place of business with________, ( name) a competentperson in charge thereof._____________

Officer

Received by Respondent/s representative/s:

___________________ __________________Signature Date___________________ __________________

Signature Date

(48)

30

A H A N D B O O K

IT SEEMSTOBESOEASY

IT ISAVERY TEDIOUSPROCESS THAT NEEDSAGREAT DEAL OFRESPECTAND LISTENING

.

REMEMBERYOU ARE A NOTAJUDGEBUTA MEDIATOR

LET BOTH PARTIESFINDA SOLUTIONTOTHEIR DISPUTE

.

YES

,

BUT IT SHOULDBEIN

A LANGUAGEOR

DIALECT

KNOWNTO

PARTIES

.

SOIFTHEY AGREEDTOHAVE

SETTLEMENT

,

SHOULDWEPUTINTO WRITING THETERMSAND CONDITION OFTHEIR SETTLEMENT

?

IT ISVERYIMPORTANT TOEXPLAINTHEPROCESS AND OBJECTIVES OFTHEMEDIATIONAND THE RULESTOBEOBSERVEDDURING THE MEDIATION

.

IT ISBETTERIFYOUCOULDSTART THEWHOLEPROCESS WITHAPRAYER

GIVEEACHPARTY TIME TOEXPLAINTHEIR SIDE

WITHOUT INTERRUPTIONFROMTHEOTHER PARTY

.

ASKQUESTIONS ANDINVOLVEBOTH PARTIES

INLOOKINGFORTHE SOLUTIONOFTHEIR DISPUTES

.

THEN

,

WHATWILL IDO

?

ISTHERE A

(49)

31

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA___________________ Barangay Case No. ___________________________________ For: ____________________________ Complainant/s________________________________________________________________ — against —____________________________________ Respondent/sAMICABLE SETTLEMENT

We, complainant/s and respondent/s in the above-captioned case, do herebyagree to settle our dispute as follows:

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

and bind ourselves to comply honestly and faithfully with the above terms ofsettlement.

Entered into this ______ day of __________, 19_______.Complainant/s Respondent/s

___________________ _____________________________________ __________________

ATTESTATION

I hereby certify that the foregoing amicable settlement was entered into by theparties freely and voluntarily, after I had explained to them the nature andconsequence of such settlement.

______________________________Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman

KP FORM # 16: AMICABLE SETTLEMENT

HOWCAN WEBE ENSUREDTHAT THEAGREEMENT WILLBE COMPLIED

?

AFTER 10 DAYS

,

THE SETTLEMENTWILL BEEXECUTORY AND IT HASTHEFORCEAND

EFFECTOFA DECISIONOFA COURT

.

(50)

32

A H A N D B O O K

INTHAT CASE

,

ANYPARTY CANPROTEST THESETTLEMENT WITHIN10 DAYS

.

FORAFTER 10 DAYS

,

THE SETTLEMENTWILLTAKEEFFECT

.

HE

/

SHE CANVOLUNTARYCOMPLY WITHTHE SETTLEMENTWITHIN 5DAYS

.

HOWEVER

,

IFHE

/

SHEFAILS

,

THEN

,

WE CANTAKE HIS

/

HERPROPERTYASPRESCRIBED BY LAW

.

WE CANDISCUSS THATFURTHER LATER

.

HOWCAN THERESPONDENTCOMPLY WITHTHE SETTLEMENT

?

WHATIFMYMEDIATIONFAILS ANDNOSETTLEMENT ISEVERREACHED

?

ISTHERE ANYWAY THATTHE PARTIESCANSETTLE THEIRDISPUTES

?

YES

,

OFCOURSE

.

OURCULTUREPROVIDESQUITEA NUMBEROFWAYS OFRESOLVINGDISPUTES

.

ONEOFTHESEIS RESOLVINGTHROUGHA GROUP OFCONCILIATORS KNOWNAND RESPECTED BYBOTHPARTIES

INTHE CODE

,

WECALL THISPANGKATTAGAPAGKASUNDO

.

WHATIFANY OF

DISPUTANT WASFORCEDTOCOMEUP WITH THE

SETTLEMENTTHROUGHFRAUD

,

THREATORINTIMIDATION

?

(51)

CONCILIATION

THROUGH

THE

PANGKAT

TAGAPAGSUNDO

C H A P T E R T H R E E

KAP

,

WHATIF

,

IHAVEDONEMY BESTIN MEDIATIONYETTHE PARTIESHAVENOT

COMETOAN AMICABLE

SETTLEMENT

.

CAN

THEYNOW ELE

VATETHE CASE

TOTHE

COURT

?

NO

!

THEPARTIESSTILLHAVE TOGOTOTHECONCILIATIONPROCEEDINGS

.

MEDIATIONAND CONCILIATIONPROCESSES ARETHE SAME EXCEPTMEDIATIONISDONE BY THEPUNONGBARANGAY WHIETHE

LATTER

IS

DONE BYTHEPANGKATHEADED BYACHAIRPERSON

.

JUSTLIKEMEDIATION

,

WHATIS THEPROCESS OFCONCILIATION

?

YOU

,

ASTHE PUNONGBARANGAYWILLCONSTITUTETHEPANGKAT NGTAGPAGSUNDOWITHIN15 DAYSFROMTHE LASTDAYOF THEMEDIATIONPROCEEDINGS

.

BEFORE THAT

,

HOWDOESCONCILIATIONDIFFERFROM

(52)

34

A H A N D B O O KRepublic of the Philippines

Province of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY

NOTICE FOR CONSTITUTION OF PANGKAT

TO: __________________ ______________________________________ ____________________Complainant/s Respondent/s

You are hereby required to appear before me on the ______ day of_________, 19____, at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for theconstitution of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo which shall conciliate yourdispute. Should you fail to agree on the Pangkat membership or to appear onthe aforesaid date for the constitution of the Pangkat, I shall determine themembership thereof by drawing lots.

This ________ day of ____________, 19_____.____________________

Punong Barangay

Notified this _________ day of _________, 19_____.

TO: __________________ _____________________________________ ____________________Complainant/s Respondent/s

KP FORM # 10: NOTICE FOR CONSTITUTION OF PANGKAT

CONCILIATIONISMERELY INTERVENINGBETWEEN TWOORMORECONTENDING PARTIESINORDER TOPREVENTOR PUT ANEND TODISPUTEWITHOUT AN AGREEMENTTO ABIDEBY THEDECISION OFTHECONCILIATOR

.

WHOCANBEMEMBERS OFTHEPANGKAT

?

THETHREE MEMBERS SHALLCOME FROMTHE LUPON ANDWILL BECHOSEN BYBOTH PARTIES

,

THECOMPLAINANT ANDTHE RESPONDENT

.

(53)

35

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA___________________ Barangay Case No. ___________________________________ For: ____________________________ Complainant/s________________________________________________________________ — against —____________________________________Respondent/s

NOTICE TO CHOSEN PANGKAT MEMBER

(Date)TO: ________________

Notice is hereby given that you have been chosen member of the Pangkat ngTagapagkasundo amicably conciliate the dispute between the par in the above-entitled case.

____________________________Punong Barangay/Lupon Secretary

Received this ________ day of __________, 19_____.________________

Pangkat Member

KP FORM # 11: NOTICE TO CHOSEN PANGKAT MEMBER

WHATIFTHE PARTIESFAILTOAGREE ON THEPANGKAT MEMBERSHIP

?

YOU

,

AGAINAS THELUPON CHAIRPERSONWILLDETERMINE THE 3 MEMBERS BY

DRAWINGLOTS TOBEDISTRIBUTEDTO THEMEMBERS OFPANGKAT

.

(54)

36

A H A N D B O O K

HOW DOWE FILLVACANCY OFPANGKAT

?

IF THE PANGKATDECIDESTO DISQUALIFYANY OFITSMEMBERS

,

THE PARTIESSHOULD AGREE ONA COMMONCHOICEFORTHE REPLACEMENT

.

IFTHEY FAILTOAGREE

,

THE LUPONCHAIRPERSONSHALL

FILL THE RESULTINGVACANCY BYDRAWINGOFLOTS

.

INCASE OFVACANCY DUETO OTHERCAUSES

,

THEPUNONGBARANGAY ORTHE LUPONCHAIRPERSONSHALLINA

SIMILARMANNER

,

FILLS SUCHVACANCYSHOULD THEPARTYFAILTOAGREE ONA

COMMON CHOICE

.

AFTER THE PANGKATMEMBERS HAVE BEENCHOSEN

,

WHATWILLTHEY DO

?

THEY SHALLELECT FROMAMONGTHEMSELVESA CHAIRPERSON

AND A SECRETARY

.

THE LUPONSECRETARY SHALLGIVE

/

TURN

OVER ALLRECORDS OFTHE CASETOTHE PANGKATSECRETARY FOR

THE PANGKATTO STUDY

.

SIMILAR TOTHE MEMBERSHIPOFLUPON

,

CANWE ALSODISQUALIFYUNFIT MEMBER

/

SOF THEPANGKAT

?

RELATIONSHIP

,

BIAS

,

INTEREST OFOTHERSIMILARGROUNDS DISCOVEREDAFTER THE CONSTITUTION OFPANGKAT CANBEGROUNDSFORDISQUALIFICATIONOFPANGKAT MEMBER

.

THEPANGKAT SHALLRESOLVETHEMATTER BYA MAJORITY VOTE

.

ITSDECISION ON THISMATTER ISFINAL

.

(55)

37

K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G A Y

OH

!

THIS ISCLEARER TOME NOW

.

BUTDURINGTHE FIRSTMEETING

,

WHATISTHE IMMEDIATEGOALAND HOW DOESTHE

PANGKATPROCEEDWITH ITS TASKS

?

THE PANGKATSHALLMEET TOHEAR BOTHPARTIES

,

EXPLORE POSSIBILITIESFOR AMICABLESETTLEMENTWITHIN 15DAYS

WHICHCANBE EXTENDEDFORANOTHER 15 DAYSIN A MERITORIOUSCASE AND

ISSUE SUBPOENA OFWITNESSES WHENEVER NECESSARY

.

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of __________

CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________Barangay _________________OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA___________________ Barangay Case No. ___________________________________ For: ____________________________ Complainant/s________________________________________________________________ — against —____________________________________ Respondent/sS U B P O E N ATO: ____________________ _____________________________________________ _________________________ Witnesses

You are hereby commanded to appear before me on the ______ day of_________, 19___, at ___________ o’clock, then and there to testify in thehearing of the above-captioned case.

This ______ day of _________, 19____._______________________________Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman(Cross out whichever one is not applicable).

Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook (2024)
Top Articles
Craigslist Furniture Western Mass
Will Kamala Harris or Donald Trump Be Better for the Economy? Here's What 1 Top Wall Street Analyst Says | The Motley Fool
Spasa Parish
Gilbert Public Schools Infinite Campus
Rentals for rent in Maastricht
159R Bus Schedule Pdf
Pollen Levels Richmond
11 Best Sites Like The Chive For Funny Pictures and Memes
Finger Lakes 1 Police Beat
Craigslist Pets Huntsville Alabama
Paulette Goddard | American Actress, Modern Times, Charlie Chaplin
Red Dead Redemption 2 Legendary Fish Locations Guide (“A Fisher of Fish”)
What's the Difference Between Halal and Haram Meat & Food?
R/Skinwalker
Rugged Gentleman Barber Shop Martinsburg Wv
Jennifer Lenzini Leaving Ktiv
Havasu Lake residents boiling over water quality as EPA assumes oversight
Justified - Streams, Episodenguide und News zur Serie
Epay. Medstarhealth.org
Olde Kegg Bar & Grill Portage Menu
Half Inning In Which The Home Team Bats Crossword
Amazing Lash Bay Colony
Cyclefish 2023
Truist Bank Open Saturday
What’s Closing at Disney World? A Complete Guide
New from Simply So Good - Cherry Apricot Slab Pie
Ohio State Football Wiki
Find Words Containing Specific Letters | WordFinder®
FirstLight Power to Acquire Leading Canadian Renewable Operator and Developer Hydromega Services Inc. - FirstLight
Webmail.unt.edu
When Is Moonset Tonight
2024-25 ITH Season Preview: USC Trojans
Metro By T Mobile Sign In
Restored Republic December 1 2022
Dl 646
Apple Watch 9 vs. 10 im Vergleich: Unterschiede & Neuerungen
12 30 Pacific Time
Operation Carpe Noctem
Nail Supply Glamour Lake June
Anmed My Chart Login
No Compromise in Maneuverability and Effectiveness
'I want to be the oldest Miss Universe winner - at 31'
Gun Mayhem Watchdocumentaries
Ice Hockey Dboard
Infinity Pool Showtimes Near Maya Cinemas Bakersfield
Dermpathdiagnostics Com Pay Invoice
A look back at the history of the Capital One Tower
Alvin Isd Ixl
Maria Butina Bikini
Busted Newspaper Zapata Tx
2045 Union Ave SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49507 | Estately 🧡 | MLS# 24048395
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Greg Kuvalis

Last Updated:

Views: 6015

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Greg Kuvalis

Birthday: 1996-12-20

Address: 53157 Trantow Inlet, Townemouth, FL 92564-0267

Phone: +68218650356656

Job: IT Representative

Hobby: Knitting, Amateur radio, Skiing, Running, Mountain biking, Slacklining, Electronics

Introduction: My name is Greg Kuvalis, I am a witty, spotless, beautiful, charming, delightful, thankful, beautiful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.